“…150.08, 152.69, 152.91, 156.39, 161.13, 163.58, 164.24, 166.39) 2 (150.22, 152.82, 153.05, 156.53, 161.27, 163.71, 164.38, 166.35) 3 (150.59, 152.18, 153.42, 156.87, 161.62, 164.06, 164.26, 166.22) 4 (150.65, 155.19, 155.47, 158.82, 163.59, 163.41, 163.60, 165. 155.21, 158.48, 159.11, 161.25, 166.04, 167.85, 168.34, 171.25) 2 (155.26, 158.53, 159.16, 161.05, 165.84, 167.66, 168.14, 171.05) 3 (155.61, 158.88, 159.01, 161.63, 166.43, 168.23, 168.72, 171.63) 4 (155.88, 159.11, 159.75, 161.65, 163.59, 165.44, 165.92, 168.82) Remark 5.1. In literature, only matrix games with pay-offs of triangular or trapezoidal fuzzy numbers have been studied, e.g., Li and Yang (Li and Yang, 2004), Bector et al (Bector et al, 2004), Campos (Campos, 1989) and Clemente et al (Clemente et al, 2011). In Bector et al (Bector et al, 2004) and Campos (Campos, 1989) in (VP) 1 and (VP) 2 , leading to more computational effort.…”