2005
DOI: 10.1023/b:opte.0000048538.35456.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto Frontier Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, with Visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
118
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In [2], an addendum is incorporated into the Pareto front notion to differentiate design concepts. A Pareto front is defined given a design concept (or simply, a concept) which is an idea about how to solve a given MOP.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimisation Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [2], an addendum is incorporated into the Pareto front notion to differentiate design concepts. A Pareto front is defined given a design concept (or simply, a concept) which is an idea about how to solve a given MOP.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimisation Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with a MOP, we usually seek for a Pareto optimal solution [1] in which the objectives have been improved as much as possible without giving anything in exchange. According to [2], there are two main approaches to solve an optimisation statement for a MOP: the aggregate objective function (AOF) or the generate-first choose-later (GFCL) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competing objectives and resulting trade-off are identified. The optimal system configurations are compared and illustrated in the form of a Pareto optimal frontier [48], which shows graphically the optimisation solutions where any individual better-off would result in at least one individual worse-off. …”
Section: Thermoenvironomic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uncertainty in the control vari-able runaway boundaries, and the inherent random disturbances of the control variable setpoint. 5,8,9,[32][33][34][35][36] On the other hand, the plant optimal operating policy should be considered as a trade-off between economic, environmental, and safety objectives. By using a new "safe operation criterion" introduced by Maria and Dan,[10][11][12][13][14] based on the sum of two failure probability indices related to uncertainty in the reactor runaway boundaries and random disturbances in the operating parameters, a multi-objective optimization can be formulated by defining the sustainability by simultaneously considering technological, economic, and safety constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%