2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3242546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pareto Front-Based Multiobjective Optimization of Distributed Generation Considering the Effect of Voltage-Dependent Nonlinear Load Models

Abstract: Single objective constant PQ load models were extensively considered for site and size of distributed generation (DG) and shunt capacitor (SC) allocation. Which may lead to single non-dominated solution of unpredictable and misleading results about their site and size, loss reduction and payback period. Therefore, primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of seven nonlinear voltage-dependent load models for the siting and sizing of DG and SC considering various conflicting Multiobjective fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, nl shows the total number of branches, and (s, r) is the particular branch between bus s and r. V m and V k are the bus voltages and G sr is the branch conductance connected between bus s and r and θ sr is the branch voltage angle difference between bus angles θ s and θ s . And α is the Power loss co-efficient equal to 80.49 $/MWh [64]. Nodal voltage magnitude is an important indicator to evaluate system security and power quality (PQ).…”
Section: A Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, nl shows the total number of branches, and (s, r) is the particular branch between bus s and r. V m and V k are the bus voltages and G sr is the branch conductance connected between bus s and r and θ sr is the branch voltage angle difference between bus angles θ s and θ s . And α is the Power loss co-efficient equal to 80.49 $/MWh [64]. Nodal voltage magnitude is an important indicator to evaluate system security and power quality (PQ).…”
Section: A Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the notable improvements in the YOLO V8 model is its superior throughput compared to other YOLO algorithms, which are trained at 640 image resolution (Hussain, 2023). Despite having similar parameters, YOLO V8 demonstrates higher throughput, as shown in Figures 3A, B (Hussain, 2023;Ali et al, 2023b). This is due to its efficient design, which enables it to process large amounts of data quickly and accurately.…”
Section: Yolo V8 Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to its efficient design, which enables it to process large amounts of data quickly and accurately. A further detailed comparison is explained below in Table 1 (Hussain, 2023;Ali et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Yolo V8 Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several MOEAs have been applied to solve Multi-objective OPF (MOOPF) problem reviewed in (Niu et al, 2014;Skolfield and Escobedo, 2022) considering conventional thermal generators; these includes: enhanced GA (EGA) (Kumari and Maheswarapu, 2010), shuffle frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) (Niknam et al, 2011), quasioppositional teaching learning based optimization (QOTLBO) (Mandal and Kumar Roy, 2014), modified imperialist competitive algorithm (MICA) (Ghasemi et al, 2014), Multi-objective DE (MDE) (Shaheen et al, 2016), multi-objective modified ICA (MOMICA) (Ali et al, 2023b), modified TLBO (MTLBO) (Shabanpour-Haghighi et al, 2014), modified gaussian barebones ICA (MGBICA) (Ghasemi et al, 2015), non-dominated sorting gravitational search algorithm (NSGSA) (Bhowmik and Chakraborty, 2015), improved strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 (I-SPEA2) (Yuan et al, 2017), multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based decomposition (MOEA-D) (Zhang et al, 2016), enhanced self-adaptive differential evolution (ESDE-MC) (Pulluri et al, 2017), novel quasi-oppositional modified Jaya algorithm (QOMJaya) (Ali et al, 2023c), multi-objective dimensionbased firefly algorithm (MODFA) (Chen et al, 2018b), semidefinite programming (SDP) (Abbas et al, 2022), improved normalized normal constraint (INNC) (Rahmani and Amjady, 2018), multiobjective firefly algorithm with a constraints-prior paretodomination (MOFA-CPD) (Chen et al, 2018c), novel hybrid bat algorithm with constrained pareto fuzzy dominant (NHBA-CPFD) (Habib et al, 2022), modified pigeon-inspired optimization algorithm (MIPO) (Chen et al, 2020), and interior search algorithm (ISA) (Chandrasekaran, 2020). In these papers, the integration of renewable energy sources was not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several single objective EAs considering uncertainties in wind generation were implemented to solve the OPF problem that includes; self-adaptive evolutionary programming (SAEP) (Shi et al, 2012), Gbest-guided ABC (GABC) (Roy and Jadhav, 2015) modified bacteria foraging algorithm (MBFO) (Panda et al, 2014;Ali et al, 2023d). Whereas these papers did not employ MOEAs and do not consider the impacts of FACTS devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%