2015
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parents’ Talk About Letters With Their Young Children

Abstract: A literacy-related activity that occurs in children's homes—talk about letters in everyday conversations—was examined using data from 50 children who were visited every 4 months between 14 and 50 months. Parents talked about some letters, including those that are common in English words and the first letter of their children's names, especially often. Parents’ focus on the child's initial was especially strong in families of higher socioeconomic status, and the extent to which parents talked about the child's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
13
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This aligns with the literature showing SES-related differences in the language and literacy experiences of children prior to school (Merlo, Bowman, & Barnett, 2007;Weigel, Martin, & Bennett, 2006). This body of research has pointed to a number of home-related differences, including less access to print (Neuman & Celano, 2001), less experience with rhyming word play and nursery rhymes (Juel, Griffith, & Gough, 1986), fewer conversations about letters (Treiman et al, 2015), and less frequent storybook reading (Sénéchal, 2006) for children from lower-SES families. More research concerning how such differences in early experiences affect alphabet knowledge and phonological awareness development is warranted, particularly with respect to how home literacy experiences could potentially serve as a protective factor in preventing emergent literacy gaps.…”
Section: Ses-related Differences On Code-focused Skills In Preschoolsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This aligns with the literature showing SES-related differences in the language and literacy experiences of children prior to school (Merlo, Bowman, & Barnett, 2007;Weigel, Martin, & Bennett, 2006). This body of research has pointed to a number of home-related differences, including less access to print (Neuman & Celano, 2001), less experience with rhyming word play and nursery rhymes (Juel, Griffith, & Gough, 1986), fewer conversations about letters (Treiman et al, 2015), and less frequent storybook reading (Sénéchal, 2006) for children from lower-SES families. More research concerning how such differences in early experiences affect alphabet knowledge and phonological awareness development is warranted, particularly with respect to how home literacy experiences could potentially serve as a protective factor in preventing emergent literacy gaps.…”
Section: Ses-related Differences On Code-focused Skills In Preschoolsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For AK, it appears as if the effect of SES is mediated GAL alliteration, GRH Rhyming Socioeconomic differences in code-focused emergent… through fall preschool skills, as SES was no longer a significant predictor after initial status was included in the model. This strongly suggests that SES-related AK gaps are related to experiences outside of school contexts and aligns with literature suggesting that AK development can be facilitated by parents during the early years through conversation (Robins, Treiman, Rosales, & Otake, 2012;Treiman, Schmidt, Decker, Robins, Levine, & Demir, 2015) and shared storybook reading (Sénéchal, 2006). SES also predicted end-of-year PA skills, in line with evidence that the home literacy environment also plays a role in the PA development (Burgess, 2002).…”
Section: Ses-related Differences On Code-focused Skills In Preschoolsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, in parent–child conversations, more visual attributes are used to describe letters than pictures, and not only parents but also children emphasize letters’ visual properties (Robins, Treiman, Rosales, & Otake, ), as if (at least implicitly) they recognize the importance of visual features on letter learning and subsequent reading development. The engagement in these conversations, especially about the child's initial, was associated with better reading outcomes even after other factors, such as vocabulary, were controlled for (Treiman et al., ). More important, even before children know what letters represent (i.e., the letter‐sound correspondence), they are already sensitive to letters’ visual statistical patterns (Pollo, Kessler, & Treiman, ; Treiman, Cohen, Mulqueeny, Kessler, & Schechtman, ; Treiman & Kessler, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, parents are critical in scaffolding home language and literacy experiences that are enticing and educational (for a review, see Sénéchal & LeFevre, ). There is now considerable agreement that children's print knowledge varies as a function of the reading habits and activities modeled in their home environments (Burgess, Hecht, & Lonigan, ; Evans, Shaw, & Bell, ; Lonigan, ; Sénéchal & LeFevre, ; Treiman et al., ; Weigel, Martin, & Bennett, ). Siblings also engage in intentional teaching (Gregory, , ; Howe, Della Porta, Recchia, Funamoto, & Ross, ; Rogoff, , ; Sokal & Piotrowski, ); however, the contribution of sibling interactions to the home literacy environment has received very little attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%