1992
DOI: 10.1097/00004703-199206000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parents?? Knowledge of Neonatal Screening and Response to False-Positive Cystic Fibrosis Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These risks include the potential that infants with CF could have a delayed diagnosis by primary care providers (PCPs) who believe a negative NBS result is definitive, 25 and that infants who are properly identified with CF by the screen could be exposed to health care-acquired infections during the diagnostic evaluation or early treatment. 23 The families of infants with a positive screening result but not CF could experience unnecessary anxiety before the diagnostic result, 26,27 and doubts regarding the health of their normal infant may persist even afterward. [28][29][30][31] Recognition of these risks is vital for optimal NBS-program design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These risks include the potential that infants with CF could have a delayed diagnosis by primary care providers (PCPs) who believe a negative NBS result is definitive, 25 and that infants who are properly identified with CF by the screen could be exposed to health care-acquired infections during the diagnostic evaluation or early treatment. 23 The families of infants with a positive screening result but not CF could experience unnecessary anxiety before the diagnostic result, 26,27 and doubts regarding the health of their normal infant may persist even afterward. [28][29][30][31] Recognition of these risks is vital for optimal NBS-program design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Others expressed gratitude that the problem was diagnosed early. 46 In one study, a few parents temporarily rejected their infants, and other parents reported being overprotective and more attached, but these reactions were not common in other studies. 22 Felt early screening and diagnosis were important.…”
Section: Psychological Effects Of Newborn Screeningmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…25 Very few are aware that they could refuse testing. 30,46 Parents are unaware of and unable to consider the implications of testing, which, as we discuss in more detail below, can increase their distress if a result is abnormal. Parental knowledge of newborn screening does not appear to have improved during the 25-year span covered by this research, although the qualitative methods used make it difficult to assess trends across time.…”
Section: Knowledge Of Newborn Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…si bien la sobre identificación se ha asociado con mayor (e innecesaria) ansiedad de los padres y efecto etiquetado, como ocurre en los Screening de enfermedades crónicas complejas 52,53 , en el caso del DSM, la consecuencia se relaciona con una mayor dedicación y estimulación del niño. Se ha evidenciado que los niños con tamizaje falsamente positivos, a largo plazo van a requerir mayor estimulación y apoyo en comparación con los verdaderos negativos 54,55 .…”
Section: Validación Nacional Asqunclassified