“…Likewise, Counter's () critique of entrepreneurship programs also demonstrates specifically why and how programs with the best of intentions further marginalize landmine victims. Both quantitative and qualitative empirical studies also must directly confront existing categories and measurements for disability and how varied legal parameters and policy instruments currently function to address (or not) the disablement of particular people and groups (see, for example, Huiracocha‐Tutiven, Orellana‐Paucar, Brito, & Blume, ; Trani, Ballard, & Peña, ). Further, empirical work in former colonies, settler colonial states, post‐Soviet states, and the developmental projects of OECD countries also has value in terms of “complicating deeply simplified, atrophied representations” of the disability experience, to borrow Simpson's words.…”