Parenting Young Children: Comparison of a Psychoeducational Program in Mexico and the United States∗

Solís-Cámara, R Pedro; Fox, Robert; Nicholson, Bonnie C.

doi:10.1080/0300443001630108

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(See Figure for PRISMA flow chart.) The studies identified included: A home‐visiting program for first‐time pregnant adolescent females in Chile (Aracena et al., ) A parent education intervention in Beirut and South Lebanon (Fayyad, Farah, Cassir, Salamoun, & Karam, ) The Incredible Years Teacher Training Program in Kingston, Jamaica (Baker‐Henningham, Walker, Powell, & Gardner, ) The International Child Development Program in Maputo, Mozambique (Skar, Sherr, Clucas, & von Tetzchner, ) The STAR Parenting Program in Mexico and the United States (Solis‐Camara, Fox, & Nicholson, ) The Turkish Early Enrichment Program (Kagitcibasi, Sunar, & Bekman, ). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table summarizes key characteristics of the six included studies (Aracena et al., ; Baker‐Henningham et al., ; Fayyad et al.,2010; Kagitcibasi et al., ; Skar et al., ; Solis‐Camara et al., ). Studies occurred in six countries across four regions, including in Europe (Turkey), Latin America and the Caribbean (Chile, Jamaica, and Mexico), Middle East (Lebanon), and sub‐Saharan Africa (Mozambique).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrating Early Child Development and Violence Prevention Programs: A Systematic Review

Efevbera

McCoy

Wuermli

et al. 2018

New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Limited evidence describes promoting development and reducing violence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), a missed opportunity to protect children and promote development and human capital. This study presents a systematic literature review of integrated early childhood development plus violence prevention (ECD+VP) interventions in LMICs. The search yielded 5,244 unique records, of which N = 6 studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions were in Chile, Jamaica, Lebanon, Mexico, Mozambique, and Turkey. Five interventions were parent education programs, including center-based sessions (n = 3) and home visiting (n = 2), while one intervention was a teacher education program. All but one study reported improvements in both child development and maltreatment outcomes. The dearth of evidence on ECD+VP interventions suggests additional research is needed. Integrated ECD+VP interventions may improve multiple child outcome domains while leveraging limited resources in LMICs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Early Child Development and Violence Prevention Programs: A Systematic Review

Efevbera

McCoy

Wuermli

et al. 2018

New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cultural Factors Moderating Links Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Parenting and Coparenting Among Mexican Origin Families

Barnett

Mortensen

Gonzalez

et al. 2016

Child Youth Care Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Family and Parenting Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Children and youth in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) are at greater risk for poor mental health. Adverse circumstances including poverty, violence, and lack of available psychological treatments increase their vulnerability. Given the importance of the family environment for child and youth wellbeing, family interventions are a powerful mode of treatment; however, their development and evaluation has received relatively little attention in LMIC. Methods This review presents evidence for family-and parent-focused interventions on mental health outcomes for children and youth in LMIC and identifies treatment components present in promising interventions. A systematic search was conducted using comprehensive search terms in five databases (Global Health, PubMed, PsychINFO, PILOTS, and Cochrane Library). Reporting follows PRISMA guidelines. Independent raters screened and retrieved articles for inclusion, completed quality ratings, conducted data extraction, and coded common practice elements. Results This review included 36 papers representing 32 unique studies of family or parenting interventions in LMIC. Study designs covered: RCTs (50% of studies), pre-to-post studies (38%), and other (12%). The majority of interventions showed positive outcomes for child and youth mental health and wellbeing. The two most frequently used treatment techniques were caregiver psychoeducation and caregiver coping skills; the next most common were treatment processes of providing between-session homework and accessibility promotion. Conclusions Evidence for family-focused interventions for child and youth mental health in LMIC is growing with several promising approaches that should be more rigorously evaluated. Further research into effects of specific intervention components will ensure targeted and optimally effective interventions.

show abstract

Parenting Young Children: Comparison of a Psychoeducational Program in Mexico and the United States∗

Cited by 10 publications

References 31 publications

Integrating Early Child Development and Violence Prevention Programs: A Systematic Review

Integrating Early Child Development and Violence Prevention Programs: A Systematic Review

Cultural Factors Moderating Links Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Parenting and Coparenting Among Mexican Origin Families

A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Family and Parenting Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About