2014
DOI: 10.1111/disa.12070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parenting in Fukushima City in the post‐disaster period: short‐term strategies and long‐term perspectives

Abstract: Growing evidence indicates the adverse psychological and welfare consequences of nuclear power accidents particularly among parents of small children. However, little has been published about the public health experiences of and practical countermeasures to deal with such consequences for parents of small children in the aftermath of disasters. Based on our past research efforts to develop parenting support programmes in Fukushima City, we describe here the discussions and resulting strategies that developed f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some personal dosimeters (e.g., D‐Shuttle) provided real‐time readouts of doses that could be connected to global positioning systems (GPS), allowing people to understand environmental factors and the condition of different locations that might influence their personal radiation dose (Naito et al ). Other successful empowerment projects included the use of BabyScan, a whole body portable radiation counter for small children (Hayano et al ), medical support for mothers of young children (Goto et al ), and a wide range of school monitoring projects (Adachi et al ). Many initiatives provided the opportunity for dialogue between experts and residents of affected communities and demonstrated that success required sufficient resources to provide such expert support as training of local public health experts.…”
Section: Control Dignity and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some personal dosimeters (e.g., D‐Shuttle) provided real‐time readouts of doses that could be connected to global positioning systems (GPS), allowing people to understand environmental factors and the condition of different locations that might influence their personal radiation dose (Naito et al ). Other successful empowerment projects included the use of BabyScan, a whole body portable radiation counter for small children (Hayano et al ), medical support for mothers of young children (Goto et al ), and a wide range of school monitoring projects (Adachi et al ). Many initiatives provided the opportunity for dialogue between experts and residents of affected communities and demonstrated that success required sufficient resources to provide such expert support as training of local public health experts.…”
Section: Control Dignity and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other successful empowerment projects included the use of BabyScan, a whole body portable radiation counter for small children (Hayano et al 2014), medical support for mothers of young children (Goto et al 2014), and a wide range of school monitoring projects (Adachi et al 2015). Many initiatives provided the opportunity for dialogue between experts and residents of affected communities and demonstrated that success required sufficient resources to provide such expert support as training of local public health experts.…”
Section: Control Dignity and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directly related to mental health is the question of how non-radiation factors, specifically lifestyle and behavioural factors, may alter health of the population in the long-term. There is information that continued fear related to radiation exposure may lead parents and teachers to keep children indoors and that many people continue to avoid locally grown fruits and vegetables, favouring instead food (even if processed) produced elsewhere [ 18 , 19 ]. Many of those evacuated, due to elevated radiation levels or the devastation of the tsunami and earthquake, transitioned from farming communities to urban settings.…”
Section: Changes In Non-radiation Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following exposure of a population to radiation, concern about the risk of radiation-induced cancer can be a major source of anxiety, 1 , 2 particularly for parents concerned about the future health of their children. 3 Despite the obvious importance of preventing accidental radiation exposure and reducing exposure levels, it is not currently known whether there is a practical way to specifically mitigate radiation-induced cancer risk once exposure has occurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%