2013
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parenting advantage in the MNC: An embeddedness perspective on the value added by headquarters

Abstract: What determines the value an MNC's headquarters adds to its own affiliates? In this paper, we shed light on this question by linking the embeddedness view of the multinational corporation to the literature on parenting advantage. We test our hypotheses on an original dataset of 124 manufacturing subsidiaries located in Europe. Our results indicate that the external embeddedness of the MNC is an antecedent to headquarters' value creation. We find that headquarters' investments into their own relationships with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
121
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
9
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides showing that the internal embeddedness of innovating subsidiaries matters for the organizational setup of the firm (Meyer et al 2011), our findings provide substance to the idea that the subsidiary's embeddedness in large innovation development networks affects hierarchical involvement in two distinct ways: (a) a larger network triggers broader involvement from the hierarchy on the corporate and the divisional level, and (b), it lets the organization react in a stronger way to intra-/inter-divisional embeddedness. With these findings, we add to previous research that has investigated subsidiary embeddedness effects on parent behavior (e.g., Andersson et al 2007;Nell and Ambos 2013) by highlighting that not only the degree of embeddedness matters (the strength of ties or relationships) but also the type of network in which the subsidiary is embedded, and particularly the network size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides showing that the internal embeddedness of innovating subsidiaries matters for the organizational setup of the firm (Meyer et al 2011), our findings provide substance to the idea that the subsidiary's embeddedness in large innovation development networks affects hierarchical involvement in two distinct ways: (a) a larger network triggers broader involvement from the hierarchy on the corporate and the divisional level, and (b), it lets the organization react in a stronger way to intra-/inter-divisional embeddedness. With these findings, we add to previous research that has investigated subsidiary embeddedness effects on parent behavior (e.g., Andersson et al 2007;Nell and Ambos 2013) by highlighting that not only the degree of embeddedness matters (the strength of ties or relationships) but also the type of network in which the subsidiary is embedded, and particularly the network size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Recent contributions have investigated how headquarters attempt to add value to the organization (Nell and Ambos 2013), for example by transferring knowledge to their subsidiaries (e.g., Nell et al 2016;Parmigiani and Holloway 2011), by enabling the development and the sharing of innovations within the firm (e.g., Ciabuschi et al 2011a;Dellestrand and Kappen 2012;Un and Cuervo-Cazurra 2004), or by managing inter-divisional conflicts and uncertainty (Poppo 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, improving internal knowledge markets requires a greater coordination role to integrate knowledge from separate subsidiaries (Nell and Ambos 2013). This traditionally has underlined the continuing relevance of headquarters (of various types), even where the MNE itself moves towards a network structure.…”
Section: The Perils Of Growing Too Fast: the Mne And The Dispersion-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies Corporate Headquarters 13 already highlighted that the role of the CHQ in the MNC depends on the characteristics of the international subsidiaries (Rutenberg, 1969) and that a firm's change towards multinational operations leads to changes in its CHQ reporting and control systems (McInnes, 1971). Prior research has focused on diverse characteristics of a firm's international units, including their international subsidiaries' networks and actions (Vahlne, Schweizer & Johanson, 2012), local stakeholders (Crilly, 2011), resource dependence, importance, managers' nationality (Martinez & Ricks, 1989), initiatives and autonomy (Ambos, Andersson & Birkinshaw, 2010), internal and external embeddedness (Ciabuschi, Dellestrand & Martín, 2011a;Nell & Ambos, 2013), ownership arrangements and choices (Chan & Makino, 2007;Martinez & Ricks, 1989), as well as expatriate managers' decision autonomy (Takeuchi, Shay & Li, 2008). For example, Martinez and Ricks (1989) draw upon resource-dependence and control theory and find with a survey of 115 Mexican affiliates of a US-based MNCs that the CHQ's influence is positively related to the affiliate's resource dependence.…”
Section: The Chq and The Operating Units' Characteristics (2-1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the other firm characteristics explored in the context of CHQ research are diverse aspects, such as firm's size (Bazzaz & Grinyer, 1981;Berger & Ofek, 1995;Collis et al, 2007;Leontiades & Tezel, 1981), shared identity and values (Ohmae, 1989), work environment (Thurm, 2005), performance (Stubbart, 1982), and embeddedness (Nell & Ambos, 2013). Particularly the number of studies that consider the influence of a firm's size on the CHQ and on its relationship to performance is notable.…”
Section: The Chq and Firm Characteristics (3-1)mentioning
confidence: 99%