2001
DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parenteral nutrition and cyclosporine: do lipids make a difference? A prospective randomized crossover trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five patients in the control group, however, died of acute GVHD compared to none in the lipid-based group, possibly due to improved activity of immunosuppressive therapy with a higher lipid dose. Santos and co-workers, 37 however, showed no effect on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics between lipid-enriched (30%) and lipid-free TPN when given to 10 allogeneic HSCT patients.…”
Section: Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Five patients in the control group, however, died of acute GVHD compared to none in the lipid-based group, possibly due to improved activity of immunosuppressive therapy with a higher lipid dose. Santos and co-workers, 37 however, showed no effect on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics between lipid-enriched (30%) and lipid-free TPN when given to 10 allogeneic HSCT patients.…”
Section: Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cyclosporine has a narrow therapeutic index and various toxic effects, mostly concentration dependent and pharmacokineticly related to patient or co-medication characteristic s [171]. Failure or delay to reach target levels can result in both serious immunologic hazards such as GvHD or poor engraftment and toxicities like kidney injury, hypertension, hyperglycemia, CNS toxicities or infectious complications although some of them may occur at therapeutic levels [15,[172][173].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic-related Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has not been conclusively determined whether the tip of the catheter is better positioned in the superior vena cava or in the right atrium [62], [63], [64], [65]. However, pericardial tamponades, cardiac arrhythmia, heart lesions and thromboses have been described when the catheter tip has been positioned in the atrium, rendering this an obsolete position.…”
Section: Central Venous Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically relevant catheter-associated thromboses are late complications of long-term PN [63], [64], [65]. Catheter occlusions can occur because of the generation of fibrin or thrombin build-up or partial or total parietal thrombosis [158].…”
Section: Central Venous Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%