Abstract:BackgroundFollowing paediatric cardiac surgery, quality of life may be significantly impacted by morbidities associated with cardiac surgery. Parental understanding of the potential for postoperative morbidity is important for informed decision making. As part of a broader research study, we aimed to elicit parental understanding and experience of the communication of morbidities following their child’s cardiac surgery, using traditional focus groups together with an online forum.MethodsThe Children’s Heart Fe… Show more
“…The Children's Heart Federation, Little Hearts Matter and the Somerville Foundation, all of which are national UK charities dedicated to the support of patients with CHD and their families, facilitated and moderated one or more closed, anonymous, asynchronous online discussion groups via their Facebook pages, following an approach that we have successfully used in previous work. 19 20 We specifically chose these three charities because we wanted to collect views across age ranges (parents of younger children, teenagers and adult patients with CHD) and from those with complex and less complex CHD. Questions were developed by the authors and the content and language revised based on feedback from the charity representatives and PPI group.…”
Section: Participants and Data Collectionmentioning
ObjectivesGlobally, healthcare systems have been stretched to the limit by the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant changes have had to be made to the way in which non-COVID-19-related care has been delivered. Our objective was to understand, from the perspective of patients with a chronic, life-long condition (congenital heart disease, CHD) and their parents/carers, the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of care, how changes were communicated and whether healthcare providers should do anything differently in a subsequent wave of COVID-19 infections.Design and settingQualitative study involving a series of asynchronous discussion forums set up and moderated by three patient charities via their Facebook pages.ParticipantsPatients with CHD and parents/carers of patients with CHD.Main outcome measuresQualitative responses to questions posted on the discussion forums.ResultsThe forums ran over a 6-week period and involved 109 participants. Following thematic analysis, we identified three themes and 10 subthemes related to individual condition-related factors, patient-related factors and health professional/centre factors that may have influenced how patients and parents/carers experienced changes to service delivery as a result of COVID-19. Specifically, respondents reported high levels of disruption to the delivery of care, inconsistent advice and messaging and variable communication from health professionals, with examples of both excellent and very poor experiences of care reported. Uncertainty about follow-up and factors related to the complexity and stability of their condition contributed to anxiety and stress.ConclusionsThe importance of clear, consistent communication cannot be over-estimated. Our findings, while collected in relation to patients with CHD, are not necessarily specific to this population and we believe that they reflect the experiences of many thousands of people with life-long conditions in the UK. Recommendations related to communication, service delivery and support during the pandemic may improve patients’ experience of care and, potentially, their outcomes.
“…The Children's Heart Federation, Little Hearts Matter and the Somerville Foundation, all of which are national UK charities dedicated to the support of patients with CHD and their families, facilitated and moderated one or more closed, anonymous, asynchronous online discussion groups via their Facebook pages, following an approach that we have successfully used in previous work. 19 20 We specifically chose these three charities because we wanted to collect views across age ranges (parents of younger children, teenagers and adult patients with CHD) and from those with complex and less complex CHD. Questions were developed by the authors and the content and language revised based on feedback from the charity representatives and PPI group.…”
Section: Participants and Data Collectionmentioning
ObjectivesGlobally, healthcare systems have been stretched to the limit by the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant changes have had to be made to the way in which non-COVID-19-related care has been delivered. Our objective was to understand, from the perspective of patients with a chronic, life-long condition (congenital heart disease, CHD) and their parents/carers, the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of care, how changes were communicated and whether healthcare providers should do anything differently in a subsequent wave of COVID-19 infections.Design and settingQualitative study involving a series of asynchronous discussion forums set up and moderated by three patient charities via their Facebook pages.ParticipantsPatients with CHD and parents/carers of patients with CHD.Main outcome measuresQualitative responses to questions posted on the discussion forums.ResultsThe forums ran over a 6-week period and involved 109 participants. Following thematic analysis, we identified three themes and 10 subthemes related to individual condition-related factors, patient-related factors and health professional/centre factors that may have influenced how patients and parents/carers experienced changes to service delivery as a result of COVID-19. Specifically, respondents reported high levels of disruption to the delivery of care, inconsistent advice and messaging and variable communication from health professionals, with examples of both excellent and very poor experiences of care reported. Uncertainty about follow-up and factors related to the complexity and stability of their condition contributed to anxiety and stress.ConclusionsThe importance of clear, consistent communication cannot be over-estimated. Our findings, while collected in relation to patients with CHD, are not necessarily specific to this population and we believe that they reflect the experiences of many thousands of people with life-long conditions in the UK. Recommendations related to communication, service delivery and support during the pandemic may improve patients’ experience of care and, potentially, their outcomes.
“…10 Our qualitative research showed that clinicians and parents hold differing views about which specific postoperative events should be counted as adverse early outcomes of pediatric cardiac surgery. 11,12, Therefore, we used the term morbidity, a state of health generally viewed as bad for you, to label the range of adverse early outcomes (excluding death). We recognized that not all such adverse early outcomes are directly caused by the surgical procedure, although they do arise as a direct consequence of children undergoing cardiac surgery.…”
Background
Most children now survive cardiac surgery, and the focus of quality improvement initiatives has shifted toward more complex outcome measures. The aim of this investigation was to study the impact of early postoperative morbidities on parent-reported patient quality of life and parental anxiety or depression over 6 months.
Methods
This prospective case-matched cohort study was conducted in 5 UK children’s cardiac centers. Measures of impact for patient categories of “single morbidity,” “multiple morbidities,” and “extracorporeal life support (ECLS)” were compared with “no morbidity.” The measures used were the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. The study modeled the outcomes using mixed effects regression, adjusting for case mix and clustering within centers.
Results
The study included 666 patients who underwent operation at a median age of 81 days (interquartile range, 10 to 325 days). At 6-week follow-up, significant adjusted differences to the reference group with no morbidity were found for total PedsQL scores, which were lower in patients with ECLS (
P
= .01), multiple morbidities (
P
< .001), and a single morbidity (
P
= .04), as well as the proportion of parents with anxiety and depression, which were higher in the group with multiple morbidities (
P
= .04 and
P
= .01, respectively). At 6 months, measures had improved in all morbidity groups. The only significant adjusted difference in the reference group was for physical PedsQL scores in ECLS (
P
= .04) and multiple morbidities (
P
< .01).
Conclusions
Patient and parent well-being are strongly influenced by postoperative morbidities early after surgery, with improvement by 6 months. Family psychological support and holistic rehabilitation are vital for children who experience postoperative morbidities.
“…We believe that these data and analyses can help surgeons, because the degree of PFC can be preliminarily assessed with preoperative computerized tomography [ 17 ]. This preliminary assessment can be used to inform the the surgeon’s preoperative decision regarding which surgical to use and the surgeon’s communication with the patient’s family, informing them of the possible postoperative complications, which constitute an important part of preoperative conversations with family members [ 30 ].…”
We performed a single-centre retrospective analysis using data from databases that were prospectively maintained in our centre between January 2019 and September 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on the degree of pulmonary fissure completeness (PFC), using the fissure development scoring system. Patients with grades 2 or 3 PFC were considered to have incomplete pulmonary fissures and were included in Group A, and patients with grades 0 and 1 were considered to have complete pulmonary fissures and were included in Group B. The differences in demographics, perioperative characteristics and clinic outcomes between the two groups were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. A total of 213 patients with congenital lung malformation (CLM) underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. There were 30 patients in Group A and 183 patients in Group B. Our data showed that compared with Group B, Group A had a higher incidence of complications, especially Clavien-Dindo grade II and grade III complications. The degree of PFC was significantly correlated with the length of chest tube drainage and postoperative hospital stay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the degree of PFC could be used to predict the incidence of postoperative complications.ConclusionsThe degree of PFC is a predictor of the incidence of complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy in children with CLM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.