2014
DOI: 10.1080/14681811.2014.918032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental support for teenage pregnancy prevention programmes in South Carolina public middle schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…South Carolina is generally perceived as a conservative state. However, these findings are consistent with previous research in the state and the nation that indicated high levels of parental and community support for comprehensive approaches to sexual and reproductive health education (Alton, Valois, Oldendick, & Drane, 2009;Barr, Moore, Johnson, Forrest, & Jordan, 2014;Dunn, Thompson, M'Cormack, Yannessa, & Duffy, 2014;Eisenberg et al, 2008;Ito et al, 2006;Rose, Prince, Flynn, Kershner, & Taylor, 2014). These findings are consistent with previous literature that indicated parental support for comprehensive sexuality education as a factor in the adoption of programs and policies (Eisenberg et al, 2008;Ito et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…South Carolina is generally perceived as a conservative state. However, these findings are consistent with previous research in the state and the nation that indicated high levels of parental and community support for comprehensive approaches to sexual and reproductive health education (Alton, Valois, Oldendick, & Drane, 2009;Barr, Moore, Johnson, Forrest, & Jordan, 2014;Dunn, Thompson, M'Cormack, Yannessa, & Duffy, 2014;Eisenberg et al, 2008;Ito et al, 2006;Rose, Prince, Flynn, Kershner, & Taylor, 2014). These findings are consistent with previous literature that indicated parental support for comprehensive sexuality education as a factor in the adoption of programs and policies (Eisenberg et al, 2008;Ito et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%