2007
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental perceptions of children's oral health: The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS)

Abstract: Background: Dental disease and treatment experience can negatively affect the oral health related quality of life (OHRQL) of preschool aged children and their caregivers. Currently no valid and reliable instrument is available to measure these negative influences in very young children. The objective of this research was to develop the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) to measure the OHRQL of preschool children and their families.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

81
753
12
70

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(935 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
81
753
12
70
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the comparison between a group without caries and another group with a number of teeth with caries more distant from zero. 1,5,16 In a probabilistic sample, a statistically significant result, but with a moderate effect size, was found in the comparison of children without caries and those with one to three teeth with caries, whereas a large effect size was found in the comparison of children without caries and those with four or more teeth with caries. 4 A moderate effect size was also found for a probabilistic sample that demonstrated a high degree of statistical significance with a cutoff point of one or more teeth with caries.…”
Section: Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the comparison between a group without caries and another group with a number of teeth with caries more distant from zero. 1,5,16 In a probabilistic sample, a statistically significant result, but with a moderate effect size, was found in the comparison of children without caries and those with one to three teeth with caries, whereas a large effect size was found in the comparison of children without caries and those with four or more teeth with caries. 4 A moderate effect size was also found for a probabilistic sample that demonstrated a high degree of statistical significance with a cutoff point of one or more teeth with caries.…”
Section: Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Table 1 displays the effect size findings for validation studies with non-probabilistic sampling. The effect sizes for the studies by Pahel et al 1 and Peker et al 5 ranged from small to moderate when using a cutoff of one to three teeth with caries and large when a cutoff of four or more teeth with caries was used. The effect size was large for the three remaining studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations