2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2002.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental net wealth and personal consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 These specifications, and indeed the available data, do not distinguish between wealth effects (Poterba 2001, Hrung 2004, Villanueva 2005 and ownership effects (more valuable firms have more owners and therefore more potential donors).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 These specifications, and indeed the available data, do not distinguish between wealth effects (Poterba 2001, Hrung 2004, Villanueva 2005 and ownership effects (more valuable firms have more owners and therefore more potential donors).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When wealth is held in illiquid forms, such as private business, households are less likely to make inter vivos transfers than when wealth was held in more liquid forms (Poterba 2001). The amount of inter vivos transfers also increases with the lifetime income of parents (Poterba 2001, Hrung 2004): an additional dollar of parental lifetime income appears to increase inter vivos transfers by 0.7 cents in Germany and by 1.2 cents in the United States (Villanueva 2005). Another issue is the allocation of inter vivos gifts among heirs.…”
Section: Inter Vivos Transfers and Family Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While firms are typically the focus of the theory and empirical interest, the units of observation in most data sets are households rather than firms. Empirical studies indicate that transfer taxes influence behavior, 6 and that the amount of inter vivos transfers depends on the incomes of parents and children (Bernheim et al 2004, Joulfaian 2004, Hrung 2004, Villanueva 2005, McGarry 1999, Arrondel and Laferrère 2001, Stark and Zhang 2002. Taxpayers forego substantial savings by not making inter vivos transfers that fully exploit annual gift tax exemptions (Poterba 2001, McGarry 2001, 2013, Joulfaian and McGarry 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What would they have left?" (this variable has already been used as a measure of bequests in the related literature; see, for example, Hrung (2004), and also Villanueva (2005) for a detailed discussion on why "hypothetical bequests" variables are appropriate for this kind of analysis). Note that, among the three b variables we use, only two (gifts and time) can be considered inter-vivos transfers.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%