Behavior of Marine Animals 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2988-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Investments by Seabirds at the Breeding Area with Emphasis on Northern Gannets, Morus bassanus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gannets use the first portion of their foraging trips to feed themselves, before capturing food for their chicks and returning to the breeding site (Hamer et al 2000;RopertCoudert et al 2004). We found that females and males bring similar amounts of foods to chicks (in terms of mass), which contrasts with previous suggestions that female gannets are likely to be the main food supplier to the offspring (Montevecchi and Porter 1980;.…”
Section: Sex-specific Macronutrient Differencescontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gannets use the first portion of their foraging trips to feed themselves, before capturing food for their chicks and returning to the breeding site (Hamer et al 2000;RopertCoudert et al 2004). We found that females and males bring similar amounts of foods to chicks (in terms of mass), which contrasts with previous suggestions that female gannets are likely to be the main food supplier to the offspring (Montevecchi and Porter 1980;.…”
Section: Sex-specific Macronutrient Differencescontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…First, in marine prey species water content varies inversely proportional to lipid content among seasons and locations (Montevecchi and Piatt 1984). Our results suggest that males and females bring nutritionally imbalanced foods to the nest, but when combined allow the offspring to reach its multidimensional nutritional target of protein, lipid, water and micronutrients (Montevecchi and Porter 1980;Morehouse et al 2010). In this case, adults' nutritional needs are likely to influence foraging behaviour (diving, foraging trip durations and habitat use), such that different sexes will exploit vertical and horizontal habitats to capture certain foods that enable them to attain specific nutrients (Lewis et al 2002;Cleasby et al 2015).…”
Section: Sex-specific Macronutrient Differencesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the devices caused the birds to forage less efficiently than normal. The equipment of the birds for 2 to 4 d represents only a very short part of the whole chick-rearing penod of about 13 wk (Nelson 1978, Montevecchi & Porter 1980. It is quite probable that fluctuating food availability leads to different success rates of all birds in the colony (Gremillet 1997).…”
Section: Activities and Foraging Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T h e higher rates of courtship feeding by 2-egg males relative to 3-egg males during the post-laying period may reflect continued nutritional provisioning during the energetically demanding egg-laying period of females. In addition, males of several species of seabirds lose as much as, or more weight, prior to the incubation period, than do females (e.g., King Penguins Aptenodytes patagonica, Stonehouse 1960; Galapagos Penguins Spheniscus mendiculus, Boersma 1977; Northern Gannets MOYUS (Sula) bassanus, Montevecchi & Porter 1980). In many species of larids, courtship feeding by males allows the female to spend considerable amounts of time a t the nest site during the egg-formation stage.…”
Section: A W I G G I N S a N D R D M O R R I S I B I S 129mentioning
confidence: 99%