1977
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality.

Abstract: Current theory in sexual selection is extended to predict within-sex variability with regard to selectivity towards mates in different mating systems. Generally, the sex that invests more in the care of each offspring should be more selective of mates than the sex investing less. Within each sex, individuals of low mate quality should be less selective than individuals of high quality, but there should be less variation in selectivity among individuals of the sex investing more. When only one sex contributes p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in females, ROS levels during courtship were also higher as laying approached and brighter gular coloration was associated with higher levels of LP. In the brown booby, mutual mate choice and assortative mating is expected because of the long period of biparental care (Burley, 1977;Amundsen, 2000;Johnstone et al, 1996;Kokko and Johnstone, 2002). Accordingly, we recently found assortative mating by color in the brown booby (B.M., R.T., unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, in females, ROS levels during courtship were also higher as laying approached and brighter gular coloration was associated with higher levels of LP. In the brown booby, mutual mate choice and assortative mating is expected because of the long period of biparental care (Burley, 1977;Amundsen, 2000;Johnstone et al, 1996;Kokko and Johnstone, 2002). Accordingly, we recently found assortative mating by color in the brown booby (B.M., R.T., unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The 2D : 4D ratio varied with female mate preference as predicted based on egg androgen levels, suggesting that early exposure to steroids irreversibly affects brain organization in ways that influence subsequent preferences (Adkins Regan 1998). An alternative hypothesis is that mating decisions of adult females vary dynamically with their own mating quality (Burley 1977); if this is true, we expect that male zebra finches will be found to be most attracted to females with high digit ratios, and that females with such ratios will have superior fecundity. These two possibilities are not mutually exclusive, as social experience may mediate early organizational effects in adult organisms (Breedlove et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is mounting evidence that males preferentially invest in certain females, 'overtly' through mating preferences (e.g. Trivers 1972;Burley 1977;Parker 1983;Jones & Hunter 1993;Owens & Thompson 1994;Johnstone et al 1996;Amundsen & Forsgren 2001;Bonduriansky 2001;Kokko & Monaghan 2001;Byrne & Rice 2006;Chenoweth et al 2006Chenoweth et al , 2007 and 'cryptically' through preferential ejaculate expenditure (Bonduriansky 2001;Reinhold et al 2002;Wedell et al 2002;Pizzari et al 2003;Cornwallis & Birkhead 2006;Rubolini et al 2006), particularly in species where sperm competition favours strategic sperm allocation ( Wedell et al 2002). It is well established that the relative number of sperm inseminated by competing males into a female is a reliable predictor of fertilization success in several species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%