2002
DOI: 10.1177/106939702237306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Investment, Human Capital, and Cross-National Differences in Wealth

Abstract: Economists have recently turned to family variables in search of explanations for why the economies of some countries grow more rapidly than others. This research tested the hypothesis that crossnational indicators of parental investment and human capital would be predictive of GNP per capita of 147 countries. Regression analysis found that close to two thirds of the variance in GNP was explained by parental investment factors (including total fertility rates, the adult sex ratio, polygyny, contraception, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A country's level of economic development was controlled in terms of 1976 gross national product (GNP, World Bank, 1990). Although there are many possible measures of a country's level of economic development, all are so strongly correlated in crossnational research (typically above .90) that it makes little difference which is used for comparative research purposes (Barber, 2003a). Some researchers log-transform GNP but Lynn & Vanhanen (2002) did not in their cross-national study of IQ scores.…”
Section: Independent and Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A country's level of economic development was controlled in terms of 1976 gross national product (GNP, World Bank, 1990). Although there are many possible measures of a country's level of economic development, all are so strongly correlated in crossnational research (typically above .90) that it makes little difference which is used for comparative research purposes (Barber, 2003a). Some researchers log-transform GNP but Lynn & Vanhanen (2002) did not in their cross-national study of IQ scores.…”
Section: Independent and Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…GNP per capita is the average income (including production abroad) of a country’s citizens (World Bank 2003). However, economic indicators such as GNP reflect a broader range of differences in the structure of opportunities, the quality of life, and availability of resources, as reflected by differences in levels of education (Barber 2002), well-being (Ram 1992), work opportunities (Boyle et al 2006), divorce rates (Lester 1997), individualism (Kashima and Kashima 2003), secularization (Branco 2007), life expectancy (Moser and Ichida 2001), and the status of women (Clark and Clark 2004). GNP thus implies a social and economic package that describes fundamental differences in how societies operate.…”
Section: Theory and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured as average school attendance rate (Barber 2002) or as percentage of population enrolled at universities and colleges (Habib et al 2000), human capital is positively related to national economic performance. Studying regional variations in start-ups in Sweden, Johannisson (1993) found that the share of the population with a college education was the variable with the highest exploratory power.…”
Section: Human Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%