2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental influences on children’s eating behaviour and characteristics of successful parent-focussed interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
172
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
7
172
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Parents across the studies employed a range of feeding behaviours, some of which have been positively evaluated in the literature, such as modelling, encouragement, repeated exposure and reasonable limit setting (Jansen & Tenney, 2001;Mitchell, Farrow, Haycraft & Meyer, 2013;Wardle, Carnell, & Cooke, 2005;Peters, Parletta, Lynch & Campbell, 2014) and some of which have not, such as the use of pressure and rewards (Batsell, Brown, Ansfield, & Paschall, 2002;Birch & Fisher, 1998;Kalinowski et al, 2012;Scaglioni et al, 2008;Thompson, 2010). The balancing act carried out by parents involved a practical struggle to reconcile two disparate concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Parents across the studies employed a range of feeding behaviours, some of which have been positively evaluated in the literature, such as modelling, encouragement, repeated exposure and reasonable limit setting (Jansen & Tenney, 2001;Mitchell, Farrow, Haycraft & Meyer, 2013;Wardle, Carnell, & Cooke, 2005;Peters, Parletta, Lynch & Campbell, 2014) and some of which have not, such as the use of pressure and rewards (Batsell, Brown, Ansfield, & Paschall, 2002;Birch & Fisher, 1998;Kalinowski et al, 2012;Scaglioni et al, 2008;Thompson, 2010). The balancing act carried out by parents involved a practical struggle to reconcile two disparate concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New technologies such as apps which can be loaded onto mobile devices (e.g. smartphones) are increasingly being used to address health related behaviours and while concerns exist about their unregulated content (Abroms, Padmanabhan, Thaweethai, & Phillips, 2011), apps hold significant potential as a tool for delivery of health-related interventions (Mitchell et al, 2013). This is particularly the case among low income groups who may not seek professional medical advice, but are more likely to look online for help with feeding difficulties (Brodie, Flournoy, Altman, Blendon, Benson, & Rosenbaum, 2000).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unless mothers feel able to act on this advice in their homes, their children's diets are unlikely to improve. This conclusion was also reached by a recent review of parent-focused interventions in children with non-clinical feeding problems, which suggested that parents need to be supported and empowered as well as educated to overcome the challenges in feeding young children (38) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV-TR; APA 2000) criteria, about 1-5% children are diagnosed with a Feeding Disorder of Infancy or Early Childhood, FD (Ostberg & Hagelin, 2011). Parents are concerned that their children are displaying behaviors such as selective eating, food refusal, food neophobia, picky eating, fussy eating, eating slowly, being less interested in food, having a small appetite, infantile anorexia, and sensory food aversion (Carruth, Ziegler, Gordon, & Barr, 2004;Marchi & Cohen, 1990;Mitchell, Farrow, Haycraft, & Meyer, 2013;Reau, Senturia, Lebailly, & Christoffel, 1996;Sanders, Patel, Le Grice, & Sheperd, 1993). Ostberg and Hagelin (2011) conducted a 6-year follow-up study and found that picky eating was the most frequent problem in children, followed by irritation or a bad temper at meal times, food refusal, and child's eating or feeding habits being a problem for the family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%