1985
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(198507)22:3<303::aid-pits2310220312>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental estimates of children's receptive vocabulary

Abstract: Samples of 13 mothers and fathers of normal preschool children and 11 mothers of high‐risk preschool children estimated their children's vocabulary ability by predicting their child's responses to individual PPVT‐R items and by making a global rating of their child's vocabulary ability. Prior to the parental estimations, the children had been administered the PPVT‐R. Accuracy of parental estimates, as measured by d', was low, although the mothers' average estimates were significantly higher than zero and highe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both mothers appeared to be sensitive to their child's expressive language in that they both followed their children's remarks with utterances that made for contingent information exchanges and topic relevant remarks. They also both accurately predicted their children's ability to name pictured objects (see also Gleason & Weintraub 1978, Sattler, Feldman & Bohanan 1985. If anything, the mother of the language-impaired child appeared even more in tune with her child's linguistic ability in that she accurately predicted his responses on a receptive vocabulary test beyond chance levels, while the mother of the language-normal child did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both mothers appeared to be sensitive to their child's expressive language in that they both followed their children's remarks with utterances that made for contingent information exchanges and topic relevant remarks. They also both accurately predicted their children's ability to name pictured objects (see also Gleason & Weintraub 1978, Sattler, Feldman & Bohanan 1985. If anything, the mother of the language-impaired child appeared even more in tune with her child's linguistic ability in that she accurately predicted his responses on a receptive vocabulary test beyond chance levels, while the mother of the language-normal child did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Researchers in these studies asked parents to estimate children's specific skills in a particular domain and used their estimates as a basis for calculating age equivalence scores (e.g., Byrne, Backman, & Smith, 1986). Alternatively, Sattler, Feldman, and Bohanan (1985) asked parents to rate their children's vocabulary abilities as compared to their peers by using a Likert-like scale. Investigators then transformed this rating into a standard score.…”
Section: Methods Of Estimating Congruencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sattler et al (1985) examined the possibility that the difference in the size of the correlation coefficients obtained was a function of how ratings were obtained from parents (either by asking global ratings of abilities or by asking for predictions of children's responses to specific test items). They examined this phenomenon by comparing global ratings obtained from a modified Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) (cited in Sattler et al, 1985) to actual test scores on the PPVT-R. They also examined agreement between parents and professionals on specific test responses, asking parents to predict their children's performance on each item.…”
Section: Relationship Between Methodology and Congruencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We know that parents' estimates of intelligence provide a fairly accurate approximation of their children's performance on objective tests (Sattler et al, 1985) and it would be surprising if these estimates did not inform their views about their children's future. At the same time, childhood overactivity and the related problems of inattention and impulsiveness (Schachar, 1991) are associated with a range of problems in both the intellectual and the social domains that might be expected to interfere with eventual school performance (see Sonuga-Barke et al, 1994 for a discussion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%