2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental consent in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected this method of consent as passive consent is commonly used in school-based research (Smith, Shamra Boel-Studt, & Cleeland, 2009) and has several advantages over active consent including higher response rates and less sample bias relative to active consent procedures (Courser, Shamblen, Lavrakas, Collins, & Ditterline, 2009). Response rate estimates for school-based research are 90% for passive consent and 30-60% for active consent and samples recruited with active consent procedures are less diverse and have lower rates of high risk participants (Smith et al, 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected this method of consent as passive consent is commonly used in school-based research (Smith, Shamra Boel-Studt, & Cleeland, 2009) and has several advantages over active consent including higher response rates and less sample bias relative to active consent procedures (Courser, Shamblen, Lavrakas, Collins, & Ditterline, 2009). Response rate estimates for school-based research are 90% for passive consent and 30-60% for active consent and samples recruited with active consent procedures are less diverse and have lower rates of high risk participants (Smith et al, 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important to know, as diminished capacity to consent may be used as a rationale for asking adolescent researchers for extra protections for adolescents. For example, parental consent is collected in the vast majority of adolescent substance use disorder treatment studies, even though adolescents are often legally able to consent to their own treatment (Smith et al., 2009). Thus, these findings implore IRB members to carefully examine whether they have implicit biases regarding capacity to assent for adolescents with heavy substance use and comorbid conditions (See Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research where adolescents are not legally allowed to consent to their study participation without parental consent, they are asked to provide informed assent (Smith, Boel-Studt, & Cleeland, 2009). Under the Common Rule (Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46 & subpart D, 1994) the same principles apply to both informed consent and informed assent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two other studies using the same definition of engagement, approximately 60% of youth engaged in treatment. 6,54 Our treatment engagement was highly variable between the two sites, which we think is explained by the extra treatment resources one site had as part of a treatment demonstration project funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) at the time of the study. In future studies, treatment resources (e.g., outreach and case management time) should be rigorously tracked in multi-site treatment engagement studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%