2015
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Risk of Macrosomia: a Population‐Based Case–Control Study in China

Abstract: Parental pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity and excessive GWG during pregnancy were highly associated with macrosomia. The association with GWG was most pronounced in mothers who had a normal or underweight pre-pregnancy BMI. Weight control efforts before pregnancy for mothers and fathers as well as control of maternal gain during pregnancy may reduce the risk of macrosomia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height 2 (m 2 ) using data from the records of the first prenatal care visit. According to the Working Group on Obesity in China, BMI was categorized into four levels: < 18.5 kg/m 2 (underweight), 18.5–23.9 kg/m 2 (normal weight), 24–27.9 kg/m 2 (overweight), ≥ 28 kg/m 2 (obese) [1617]. Maternal pre-pregnancy WC was measured at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest in the standing position with minimal expiration using a standard non-stretch tape at the first prenatal care, and was classified in line with Chinese standard: < 80 cm for non-central adiposity and ≥ 80 cm for central adiposity [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height 2 (m 2 ) using data from the records of the first prenatal care visit. According to the Working Group on Obesity in China, BMI was categorized into four levels: < 18.5 kg/m 2 (underweight), 18.5–23.9 kg/m 2 (normal weight), 24–27.9 kg/m 2 (overweight), ≥ 28 kg/m 2 (obese) [1617]. Maternal pre-pregnancy WC was measured at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest in the standing position with minimal expiration using a standard non-stretch tape at the first prenatal care, and was classified in line with Chinese standard: < 80 cm for non-central adiposity and ≥ 80 cm for central adiposity [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gestational BMI gain was categorized as class I (<4.0 kg/m 2 ), class II (4.0–5.9 kg/m 2 ), class III (6.0–7.9 kg/m 2 ), or class IV (≥ 8 kg/m 2 ) based on the results of our previous study23. Each one point increase in BMI was roughly equivalent to a 2.5 kg gain in weight, as determined using the Chinese national average weight and height for females of reproductive age (158 cm, 54 kg)21.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decades, researchers studied the influence of those parameters on the development of maternal and neonatal complications, such as gestational diabetes [5], pregnancy induced hypertension [6], macrosomia [7], caesarean [8] and preterm delivery [9]. The main contributors of this excess adiposity are the intake of high energy foods and the sedentary lifestyles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%