Parent Training Programs for Ethnic Minorities: a Meta-analysis of Adaptations and Effect

Abstract

This meta-analysis focuses on parent training programs for ethnic minority families and reports on (i) the adaptation of program content and (ii) the process that informs these adaptations. Relevant studies are reviewed to determine the adaptations made and the impact of the adaptations on parenting and child outcomes. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they enrolled predominantly ethnic minority parents with children aged 0–12 years, used a randomized controlled trial design with post-intervention assessments, focused on group-based parent training programs and on prevention of parenting problems, and reported parenting behavior outcomes. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. The results show that parent training programs targeting ethnic minority parents have a small but significant effect on improving parenting behavior (k = 18, Cohen’s d = 0.30), child outcomes (k = 16, Cohen’s d = 0.13), and parental perspectives (k = 8, Cohen’s d = 0.19). Most of the programs made adaptations related to surface and deep structure sensitivity. Programs with cultural adaptations, especially deep structure sensitivity (k = 7, Cohen’s d = 0.54), are more effective in improving parenting behavior. Because only a third of the included studies provided details on the processes that guided the adaptations made, additional studies are needed to provide information on the process of adaptation; this will enable others to learn from the procedures that can be undertaken to culturally adapt interventions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0733-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How community therapists describe adapting evidence‐based practices in sessions for youth: Augmenting to improve fit and reach

“…However, just as adaptations have the potential to improve the impact and durability of treatment, it is also plausible that adaptations may compromise the delivery of essential treatment mechanisms (Drake et al, 2001). Cultural adaptations research provides one such example of this tension; meta‐analyses reflect mixed evidence on the necessity and impact of cultural adaptations, with some citing adaptations as beneficial for clinical outcomes and implementation efforts (e.g., Benish, Quintana, & Wampold, 2011; Degnan et al, 2018; Hall, Ibaraki, Huang, Marti, & Stice, 2016; Van Mourik, Crone, De Wolff, & Reis, 2017), and others finding no added utility in modifying protocols (e.g., Huey & Polo, 2008; Huey & Polo, 2017; Thomas, Abell, Webb, Avdagic, & Zimmer‐Gembeck, 2017). Overall, there is continued debate on whether fidelity to manualized therapies should be prioritized over flexibility and local adaptations to the intervention for particular clients or contexts (Hamilton, Kendall, Gosch, Furr, & Sood, 2008; Owen & Hilsenroth, 2014).…”

Implementation of Reach Up early childhood parenting program: acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility in Brazil and Zimbabwe

“…When evidence‐based interventions are transported across countries and context, cultural adaptations can enhance participant attendance, retention, satisfaction, participation, and home practice and have been shown to increase the effectiveness of the interventions in improving parenting behavior . However, the literature on cultural adaptation of parenting programs largely focuses on programs targeting child behavior and on adapting evidence‐based programs developed in high‐income countries (HICs) for different ethnic groups and/or across countries (most commonly other HICs) . The literature on transporting interventions developed for use in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) across countries and contexts is limited …”

Parent Training and Skill Acquisition and Utilization Among Spanish- and English-Speaking Latino Families

“…Several meta-analyses suggest a range from small (Benish et al 2011; Huey and Polo 2008) to medium (Hall et al 2016; Smith et al 2011) effects. In the specific case of parent-training interventions, meta-analyses have yielded a similar pattern of small effects on improving parenting behaviors and child outcomes (Ortiz and Del Vecchio 2013; van Mourik et al 2016) and medium effects when these interventions go through deep structural changes (e.g., through incorporating cultural, social, and environmental factors; van Mourik et al 2016). In PCIT, results from the only trials directly comparing a culturally-adapted protocol, the GANA program, to standard PCIT showed that both interventions led to similar effects on child externalizing behavior problems and client satisfaction (McCabe et al 2012; McCabe and Yeh 2009), but GANA outperformed standard PCIT in leading to reductions in parent report of child internalizing behavior problems 6 to 24 months following treatment (McCabe et al 2012).…”