Abstract:Reciprocity - the capacity to engage in social exchange that integrates inputs from multiple partners into a unified social event - is a cornerstone of adaptive social life that is learned within dyad-specific attachments during an early period of neuroplasticity. Yet, very little research traced the expression of children's reciprocity with their mother and father in relation to long-term outcomes. Guided by evolutionary models, we followed mothers, fathers, and their firstborn child longitudinally and observ… Show more
“…Fonagy, Gergely, Jurist, and Target (2002) suggested that the evolutionary function of the dyadic relationship between parent and human infant goes far beyond ensuring the safety of the latter, to furthering the understanding of the nature of subjectivity and the ability to develop social intelligence, skills, and competence (e.g., Feldman, Bamberger, & Kanat-Maymon, 2013). Indeed, our results provide preliminary evidence that the infant's experience of the mother's embodied mentalizing carries over into childhood and expands beyond the parent-infant relationship, seeming to influence (in this observational study) the development of social skills as late as 54 months.…”
Parental mentalizing -the parent's ability to envision the child's mental states (such as desires, thoughts, or wishes) -has been argued to underlie a parent's ability to respond sensitively to their child's emotional needs, and thereby promote advantageous cognitive and socioemotional development. Mentalizing is typically operationalized in terms of how parents talk to or about their infants. This work extends research on mentalizing by operationalizing parental mentalizing exclusively in terms of nonverbal, bodily based, interactive behavior, namely parental embodied mentalizing(PEM). The purpose of the current research was twofold: (1) to establish the reliability and validity of the PEM coding system; and (2) to evaluate whether such measurement predicts infant and child cognitive and socio-emotional functioning. Assessing 200 mother-infant dyads at 6 months using the coding of PEM proved both reliable and valid, including predicting child attachment security at 15 and 36 months, and language abilities, academic skills, behavior problems, and social competence at 54 months, in many cases even after taking into consideration traditional measures of parenting, namely maternal sensitivity. Conceptual, empirical, and clinical implications are discussed.
ARTICLE HISTORY
“…Fonagy, Gergely, Jurist, and Target (2002) suggested that the evolutionary function of the dyadic relationship between parent and human infant goes far beyond ensuring the safety of the latter, to furthering the understanding of the nature of subjectivity and the ability to develop social intelligence, skills, and competence (e.g., Feldman, Bamberger, & Kanat-Maymon, 2013). Indeed, our results provide preliminary evidence that the infant's experience of the mother's embodied mentalizing carries over into childhood and expands beyond the parent-infant relationship, seeming to influence (in this observational study) the development of social skills as late as 54 months.…”
Parental mentalizing -the parent's ability to envision the child's mental states (such as desires, thoughts, or wishes) -has been argued to underlie a parent's ability to respond sensitively to their child's emotional needs, and thereby promote advantageous cognitive and socioemotional development. Mentalizing is typically operationalized in terms of how parents talk to or about their infants. This work extends research on mentalizing by operationalizing parental mentalizing exclusively in terms of nonverbal, bodily based, interactive behavior, namely parental embodied mentalizing(PEM). The purpose of the current research was twofold: (1) to establish the reliability and validity of the PEM coding system; and (2) to evaluate whether such measurement predicts infant and child cognitive and socio-emotional functioning. Assessing 200 mother-infant dyads at 6 months using the coding of PEM proved both reliable and valid, including predicting child attachment security at 15 and 36 months, and language abilities, academic skills, behavior problems, and social competence at 54 months, in many cases even after taking into consideration traditional measures of parenting, namely maternal sensitivity. Conceptual, empirical, and clinical implications are discussed.
ARTICLE HISTORY
“…Although humans are among the few mammalian species where some male parental caregiving is relatively common, father involvement varies considerably within and across cultures, adapting to ecological conditions (1,3). Involved fathering has been linked with children's long-term physiological and social development and with increases in mothers' caregivingrelated hormones such as oxytocin and prolactin (3)(4)(5)(6). In addition, animal studies demonstrated structural brain alterations in caregiving fathers (7,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that, although maternal caregiving is triggered by neurobiological processes related to pregnancy and labor, the human father's brain, similar to other biparental mammals, adapts to the parental role through active involvement in childcare (1)(2)(3). Despite growing childcare involvement of fathers (3,5,6), mechanisms for human fathers' brain adaptation to caregiving experiences remain largely unknown, and no study to our knowledge has examined the brain basis of human fatherhood when fathers assume primary responsibility for infant care.…”
Although contemporary socio-cultural changes dramatically increased fathers' involvement in childrearing, little is known about the brain basis of human fatherhood, its comparability with the maternal brain, and its sensitivity to caregiving experiences. We measured parental brain response to infant stimuli using functional MRI, oxytocin, and parenting behavior in three groups of parents (n = 89) raising their firstborn infant: heterosexual primarycaregiving mothers (PC-Mothers), heterosexual secondary-caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers), and primary-caregiving homosexual fathers (PC-Fathers) rearing infants without maternal involvement. Results revealed that parenting implemented a global "parental caregiving" neural network, mainly consistent across parents, which integrated functioning of two systems: the emotional processing network including subcortical and paralimbic structures associated with vigilance, salience, reward, and motivation, and mentalizing network involving frontopolar-medial-prefrontal and temporo-parietal circuits implicated in social understanding and cognitive empathy. These networks work in concert to imbue infant care with emotional salience, attune with the infant state, and plan adequate parenting. PC-Mothers showed greater activation in emotion processing structures, correlated with oxytocin and parent-infant synchrony, whereas SC-Fathers displayed greater activation in cortical circuits, associated with oxytocin and parenting. PC-Fathers exhibited high amygdala activation similar to PC-Mothers, alongside high activation of superior temporal sulcus (STS) comparable to SC-Fathers, and functional connectivity between amygdala and STS. Among all fathers, time spent in direct childcare was linked with the degree of amygdala-STS connectivity. Findings underscore the common neural basis of maternal and paternal care, chart brain-hormone-behavior pathways that support parenthood, and specify mechanisms of brain malleability with caregiving experiences in human fathers.mothering | parent-infant interaction | alloparental care | transition to parenthood | social brain
“…First, fathers overall are increasingly involved in childrearing (Pleck & Masciadrelli, 2004). Second, whether a child is among the approximately 64% of children (including children with ASD) in the United States who reside in a two-parent household (Freedman, Kalb, Zablotsky, & Stuart, 2012), or is in a home with a nonresident father, high-quality paternal involvement with children is related to improved child outcomes, accounting for variance beyond that accounted for by mother-child relationship variables (e.g., Adamsons & Johnson, 2013;Feldman, Bamberger, & Kanat-Maymon, 2013;Washington et al, 2014). The generalizability of these findings for fathers of typically developing children to fathers of children with ASD is unknown at this time.…”
Purpose
In this observational study, we examined the interactions of 16 young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their parents to investigate (a) differences in verbal responsiveness used by fathers and mothers in interactions with their children with ASD and (b) concurrent associations between the language skills of children with ASD and the verbal responsiveness of both fathers and mothers.
Method
Parent verbal responsiveness was coded from video recordings of naturalistic parent–child play sessions using interval-based coding. Child language skills were measured by the Preschool Language Scale–Fourth Edition (Zimmerman, Steiner, & Pond, 2002).
Results
For both fathers and mothers, parent verbal responsiveness was positively associated with child language skills. Mothers' responsiveness was also significantly associated with child cognition. After controlling for child cognition, fathers' verbal responsiveness continued to be significantly related to child language skills.
Conclusions
Although other studies have documented associations between mothers' responsiveness and child language, this is the 1st study to document a significant concurrent association between child language skills of children with ASD and the verbal responsiveness of fathers. Findings of this study warrant the inclusion of fathers in future research on language development and intervention to better understand the potential contributions fathers may make to language growth for children with ASD over time as well as to determine whether coaching fathers to use responsive verbal strategies can improve language outcomes for children with ASD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.