2020
DOI: 10.1111/cch.12813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent‐reported socioemotional and cognitive development in children with a cleft lip and/or palate at 18 months: Findings from a UK birth cohort

Abstract: Background: One of the most common congenital conditions in the world, cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) has been shown to potentially impact long-term physical and developmental outcomes in affected children. However, little is known about the factors that contribute to such outcomes, and there is a lack of consensus about which screening tools may be most effective. The aims of the current study were (a) to assess parent-reported socioemotional and cognitive development in children born with CL/P at 18 months o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty-three studies were excluded due to the following reasons: 12 included individuals whose CL/P was associated with some craniofacial syndrome or malformation [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] ; 4 evaluated types of feeding devices (e.g., feeding nipples and cups) [38][39][40][41] ; 14 did not report data on BF [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] ; 4 evaluated BF only during specific periods (e.g., hospitalizations and after repair surgeries) [56][57][58][59] ; and 9 had study designs other than observational, [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] thus resulting in 29 studies. The complete process of study identification and selection is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-three studies were excluded due to the following reasons: 12 included individuals whose CL/P was associated with some craniofacial syndrome or malformation [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] ; 4 evaluated types of feeding devices (e.g., feeding nipples and cups) [38][39][40][41] ; 14 did not report data on BF [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] ; 4 evaluated BF only during specific periods (e.g., hospitalizations and after repair surgeries) [56][57][58][59] ; and 9 had study designs other than observational, [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] thus resulting in 29 studies. The complete process of study identification and selection is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%