2023
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent–infant affect synchrony during social and solo play

Abstract: While mother–infant affect synchrony has been proposed to facilitate the early development of social understanding, most investigations into affect synchrony have concentrated more on negative than positive affect. We analysed affect sharing during parent–infant object play, comparing positive and negative affect, to examine how it is modulated by shared playful activity. Mother–infant dyads ( N = 20, average infant age 10.7 months) played together (social) or separately (solo) using an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This kind of detailed observation and cataloguing of social behaviour provides an important building block for future theories of the development of gaze and visual communication. In a second developmental study, Kidby et al [29] examine the coordination of gaze and affect between 10-month-old infants and their mothers during solo play and social play. They find that the social play condition leads to more positive affect and more coordination.…”
Section: Core Processes In Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of detailed observation and cataloguing of social behaviour provides an important building block for future theories of the development of gaze and visual communication. In a second developmental study, Kidby et al [29] examine the coordination of gaze and affect between 10-month-old infants and their mothers during solo play and social play. They find that the social play condition leads to more positive affect and more coordination.…”
Section: Core Processes In Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term coregulation describes regulatory processes that operate through the dynamic, bidirectional coordination between two interacting partners. This is not the sole aim of caregiver–child interactions: smiles and play, for example, appear not to have a regulatory function (Kidby, Neale, Wass, & Leong, 2023; Murray et al., 2016). But it is central to early development (Feldman, 2006).…”
Section: Part 2—theory—coregulation and Dysregulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Part 3 we discussed how children express negative affect to elicit coregulation, to help manage hyperarousal. The sharing of positive affect within child–caregiver interactions is also known to be atypical (in caregivers with depression, for example), but it remains poorly understood how positive valence systems, such as reward responsiveness, anticipation and valuation, are affected by, and develop through, caregiver–child coregulation (Kidby et al., 2023; Lunkenheimer et al., 2020).…”
Section: Part 5—conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term coregulation describes regulatory processes that operate through the dynamic, bidirectional coordination between two interacting partners. This is not the sole aim of caregiver-child interactions: smiles and play, for example, appear not to have a regulatory function (Kidby, Neale, Wass, & Leong, 2023;Murray et al, 2016). But it is central to early development (Feldman, 2006).…”
Section: Part 2-theory-coregulation and Dysregulation 2a Stability Sy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Part 3 we discussed how children express negative affect to elicit coregulation, to help manage hyperarousal. The sharing of positive affect within child-caregiver interactions is also known to be atypical (in caregivers with depression, for example), but it remains poorly understood how positive valence systems, such as reward responsiveness, anticipation and valuation, are affected by, and develop through, caregiver-child coregulation (Kidby et al, 2023;Lunkenheimer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Part 5-conclusion 5a Implications For Intervention Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%