“…If, as recommended by some, differences between parent and child are not as biased or inaccurate in reporting by one or the other, but rather as a "quantifier of the gap" [12], including both could provide a more developed or comprehensive picture of the child's health. Exploring the nature of that gap during office visits, including parallel assessments of parental distress over the child's health, could have important implications for both effective clinical care for the child [2][3][4]16], for family-physician communication, for family-centered pediatric care [41,42], and for parents' health and well-being. Integration of measures of children's health-related quality of life, such as the CHRIS 2.0, and parent's health as additional "vital signs" in routine pediatric practice [43] could provide valuable and unique information for clinicians and researchers evaluating and tailoring treatment regimens and improving pediatric practice.…”