2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parcellation-based modeling of the supplementary motor area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 180 brain parcellations described in the Glasser et al study, 7 4 were involved in the SMA 8 : the superior frontal language area, Brodmann area 6 medial anterior, Brodmann area 6 medial parietal, and the supplementary and cingulate eye field. The SMA is connected with the ipsi- and contralateral premotor areas for initiating movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of 180 brain parcellations described in the Glasser et al study, 7 4 were involved in the SMA 8 : the superior frontal language area, Brodmann area 6 medial anterior, Brodmann area 6 medial parietal, and the supplementary and cingulate eye field. The SMA is connected with the ipsi- and contralateral premotor areas for initiating movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A “crossed” FAT has also been described as a white matter tract that connects the SMA with the contralateral premotor area and SMA through the corpus callosum. This pathway explains bilateral hand-movement coordination of the SMA 8 , 24 and is suspected to be involved in neurological recovery during and after a temporary SMA syndrome. Compensation from the opposite hemisphere is a theory reinforced by research on functional connectivity, 25 with several studies reporting a surge in the level of activity of the contralateral SMA 26 , 27 when preserving the crossed FAT fibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While the interpretation of this aberrant connectivity remain elusive, further investigation is necessary to identify whether this functional connectivity may be related to specific symptoms not found in TD, may reflect a brain reorganization, or a spurious result. Across neuroimaging literature, the pINS appear to be implicated in processing sensory information (i.e., interoceptive processes, (Kurth et al, 2010 ; Tian & Zalesky, 2018 ), whereas the SMA is often linked to motor planning, sensory and memory tasks (Chung et al, 2005 ; Sheets et al, 2021 ), future studies should aim to examine the functional roles of these connectivity in the specific symptomatology of children with the secondary variant that may distinguish them from the primary variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lingual gyrus, lateral occipital cortex (Clarke & Miklossy, 1990)) to motor functions (i.e. supplementary motor area (Sheets et al, 2021)), somatosensory integration (i.e. parietal operculum (Eickhoff et al, 2006)), cognitive abilities (DLPFC (Murty et al, 2011), precentral, postcentral gyri, central operculum, hippocampus (Eichenbaum, 2000; Humphreys & Lambon Ralph, 2015; Padmala & Pessoa, 2010)) and emotion regulation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%