1989
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90083-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paratuberculosis in cattle: A comparison of three serologic tests with results of fecal culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported for treated animals in the accompanying report, ELISA values less than 2.5 had no predictive value for detectable fecal shedding, whereas animals with higher values were more likely to be detectable shedders. AGID positive animals were assumed to be more heavily infected than AGID negative animals since (a) AGID positive sera was always detected at the same time or subsequent to a positive ELISA; no AGID positive animal was simultaneously ELISA negative, [31][32][33][34] (b) the appearance of AGID positive serum and detected fecal shedding closely paralleled one another, 31,32 and (c) loss of detectable AGID always occurred prior to any reduction in ELISA values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported for treated animals in the accompanying report, ELISA values less than 2.5 had no predictive value for detectable fecal shedding, whereas animals with higher values were more likely to be detectable shedders. AGID positive animals were assumed to be more heavily infected than AGID negative animals since (a) AGID positive sera was always detected at the same time or subsequent to a positive ELISA; no AGID positive animal was simultaneously ELISA negative, [31][32][33][34] (b) the appearance of AGID positive serum and detected fecal shedding closely paralleled one another, 31,32 and (c) loss of detectable AGID always occurred prior to any reduction in ELISA values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, previously developed PCR-based approaches (e.g., IS900) have been shown to lack specificity (9). This result is, in part, due to the high levels of genetic similarity of Map with other mycobacteria, in particular, Mycobacterium avium (Mav) (10). Previous studies from our laboratories and elsewhere show Ďľ95% nucleotide sequence similarity between many strains of Map and Mav (11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Serological assays including agar gel immunodiffusion, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and complement fixation tests have been developed to detect antibodies against M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis in animal sera (6,8). Depending on the antigens used, these assays can yield false-positive results and may not consistently detect infected animals in the early stages of disease (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%