2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parathyroid Hormone Directs Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Cell Fate

Abstract: Summary Intermittent PTH administration builds bone mass and prevents fractures, but its mechanism of action is unclear. We genetically deleted the PTH/PTHrP Receptor (PTH1R) in mesenchymal stem cells using Prx1Cre and found low bone formation, increased bone resorption and high bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT). Bone marrow adipocytes traced to Prx1 and expressed classic adipogenic markers and high receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (Rankl) expression. RANKL levels were also elevated in bone … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
296
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
14
296
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, there are a multitude of ways in which MAT and BMAs may contribute to tumor growth, and clinically targeting MAT is an interesting and innovative concept. It is possible that therapies that build bone may also inhibit MAT, as we have recently demonstrated with anti-sclerostin antibodies [54,57], and as others have found with PTH [47] and leptin [69]. The FGF family members may also hold promise for targeting to modulate not only bone, but also MAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, there are a multitude of ways in which MAT and BMAs may contribute to tumor growth, and clinically targeting MAT is an interesting and innovative concept. It is possible that therapies that build bone may also inhibit MAT, as we have recently demonstrated with anti-sclerostin antibodies [54,57], and as others have found with PTH [47] and leptin [69]. The FGF family members may also hold promise for targeting to modulate not only bone, but also MAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These alterations in the host microenvironment ultimately support tumor growth, bone disease, and drug resistance (for example, through induction of MUC1 as recently demonstrated by Bar-Natan et al [44]), and it is very likely that MAT effects MSCs and the BM ECM. Furthermore, MAT has been found to accelerate osteoclastogenesis through secretion of Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) [4547] as well as chemokine ligand 1 and 2 (CXCL1 and CXCL2) [48], which suggests that MAT may contribute to cancer-induced osteolysis via activation of osteoclast bone resorption. Other researchers have shown that osteoclasts play a key role in determining if a myeloma cell will remain dormant or proliferate [49].…”
Section: Adipocyte and Adipokine Effects On Other Cells In The Tummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fate decision of SSCs can also be controlled by hormonal factors such as leptin, an adipokine secreted by adipocytes[77], parathyroid hormone (PTH) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP)[78]. Leptin signaling regulates bone mass systemically by acting on Leptin receptor (LepR)-expressing neurons in the hypothalamus[79] and locally by directly binding LepRs on SSCs, osteoblasts and osteoclasts (reviewed in[80]).…”
Section: Regulation Of Ssc Differentiation – Osteoblasts Versus Adipomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermittent administration of PTH stimulates bone formation by increasing osteoblast activity [81] and recruiting bone marrow stromal cells to the osteoblast lineage[82]. Recent studies revealed that PTH could also regulate the SSC fate since conditional knockout of PTH receptor-1 (PTH1R) in skeletal progenitor/stem cells resulted in increased adipogenesis accompanied by high bone resorption[78]. …”
Section: Regulation Of Ssc Differentiation – Osteoblasts Versus Adipomentioning
confidence: 99%