1990
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4835(90)90032-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasympathetic nervous control of intraocular pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our overall findings are consistent with the previously reported observations that the nonselective muscarinic antagonist atropine but not the M2 selective antagonist gallamine attenuates increases in intraocular pressure evoked by electrical stimulation of the oculomotor complex in cats (Gherezghiher, Hey and Koss, 1990). Such an increase in intraocular pressure is thought to be due to the choroidal vasodilation elicited by stimulation of parasympathetic input to eye (Bill, Stjernschantz and Alm, 1976 ;Gherezghiher, Hey and Koss, 1990). Atropine has been also reported to inhibit methacholine-induced uveal vasodilation in cats (Okubo, Gherezhiher and Koss, 1990), which is thought to be mediated via M3 muscarinic receptors (Koss, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our overall findings are consistent with the previously reported observations that the nonselective muscarinic antagonist atropine but not the M2 selective antagonist gallamine attenuates increases in intraocular pressure evoked by electrical stimulation of the oculomotor complex in cats (Gherezghiher, Hey and Koss, 1990). Such an increase in intraocular pressure is thought to be due to the choroidal vasodilation elicited by stimulation of parasympathetic input to eye (Bill, Stjernschantz and Alm, 1976 ;Gherezghiher, Hey and Koss, 1990). Atropine has been also reported to inhibit methacholine-induced uveal vasodilation in cats (Okubo, Gherezhiher and Koss, 1990), which is thought to be mediated via M3 muscarinic receptors (Koss, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The parallels between the effects of muscarinic antagonists on cholinergic vasodilation in the choroid of pigeon and the uvea of cat (Gherezghiher, Hey and Koss, 1990 ;Okubo, Gherezhiher and Koss, 1990) or the parotid gland of rat (Tobin, 1998) suggest that the muscarinic mechanisms of cholinergic vasodilation are similar in mammals and birds. While M3-selective antagonists and nonselective muscarinic antagonists attenuate the increases in blood flow elicited by parasympathetic activation in choroid and parotid gland, based on findings in the human upper limb (Bruning et al, 1994) and our current findings in pigeons, such drugs do not appear to significantly affect basal blood flow.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Muscarinic Cardiovascular Mechanisms In Birdsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, in mammals, based on anatomical studies, the parasympathetic innervation of the choroid arises primarily from the pterygopalatine ganglion (306, 318). However, physiological studies in mammals also suggest a contribution from the oculomotor nerve by way of the ciliary ganglion (122, 260). For example, electrical microstimulation of the Edinger-Westphal nucleus or the ciliary nerves has been shown to evoke increases in choroidal blood flow in the cat (e.g.…”
Section: Autonomic Control Of Ocular Blood Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, electrical microstimulation of the Edinger-Westphal nucleus or the ciliary nerves has been shown to evoke increases in choroidal blood flow in the cat (e.g. 122, 260, 358) and the rabbit (e.g. 357).…”
Section: Autonomic Control Of Ocular Blood Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter appear to exert their vasodilatory effect as a local response to peripheral stimulation under some circumstances (Holzer, 1988). The anatomical organization of these intrachoroidal nerve fibers, the transmitters they utilize and their influence on choroidal blood flow have been extensively studied in mammals (Ruskell, 1971 ;Bill, Stjernschantz and Alm, 1976 ;Butler et al, 1984 ;Stone, Kuwayama and Laties, 1987 ;Lin, Grimes and Stone, 1988 ;Gherezghiher, Hey and Koss, 1990 ;Bill, 1991 ;Deussen, Sonntag and Vogel, 1993 ;Yamamoto et al, 1993 ;Nilsson, 1994 ;Mann et al, 1995 ;Nakanome et al, 1995). In contrast, while the anatomy and function of the parasympathetic input to the choroid has been studied in birds (Gienc and Kuder, 1985 ;Meriney and Pilar, 1987 ;Fitzgerald, Vana and Reiner, 1990 a ;Fitzgerald et al, 1996 ;Sun, Erichsen and May, 1994 ;Bergua, Mayer and Neuhuber, 1996 ;Cuthbertson et al, 1996Cuthbertson et al, , 1997Zagvazdin et al, 1996), little functional information on the sensory innervation of the choroid is available for birds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%