2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasponia: a novel system for studying mutualism stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An open question is whether Parasponia nodulation is somehow less advanced than in legumes (Behm et al, 2014): our results point to similar levels of nodulation control as found in some legume species. Specifically, it has been shown that at high nitrogen levels, legumes can control nodule formation and mass-a process known as autoregulation of nodulation (Cho and Harper, 1991;Sueyoshi et al, 2003;Jeudy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…An open question is whether Parasponia nodulation is somehow less advanced than in legumes (Behm et al, 2014): our results point to similar levels of nodulation control as found in some legume species. Specifically, it has been shown that at high nitrogen levels, legumes can control nodule formation and mass-a process known as autoregulation of nodulation (Cho and Harper, 1991;Sueyoshi et al, 2003;Jeudy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…They enabled unravelling gene loss linked to the lack of developing a symbiosis in certain plant lineages but also to identify new symbiosis genes (for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (Delaux et al ., 2014; Bravo et al ., 2016); for the nodulating symbiosis (Delaux et al ., 2015; Griesmann et al ., 2018). Comparative work on symbiotic plants is often hindered, however, either by the absence of closely related species which display gain or loss of symbiotic function or, when these are present, by the lack of a well-understood genetic framework, as outlined in Behm et al . (2014), Delaux et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2016), Sprent (2017). Nevertheless, in the case of the nodulating Parasponia /non-nodulating Trema system, a fine comparative analysis was very powerful to demonstrate a parallel loss of the key symbiotic genes NFR5, NIN and RGP, in the non-nodulating species, challenging the long-standing assumption that Parasponia specifically acquired the potential to nodulate (Behm et al ., 2014; Geurts et al ., 2016; van Velzen et al ., 2018). In this respect, the uncovering of the genetic evolution of the genus Aeschynomene and related genera along with the identification of diploid species outside of the Nod-independent clade, provided a robust phylogenetic framework that can now be exploited to guide the choice of Nod-dependent diploid species for comparative genetic research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nonlegumes and early-diverging legumes, cracks in the root epidermis allow nitrogen-fixing bacteria to opportunistically colonize root interiors. In some host taxa the rhizobia form fixation threads (Box 1) in which they are only partially internalized in host cells (Behm et al, 2014;Sprent et al, 2017). By contrast, infection is highly coordinated in many derived legume taxa, in which root hairs curl and entrap compatible rhizobia, the rhizobia become encased by plant-derived membranes, and differentiated bacteroids live in tightly controlled organelle-like structures called symbiosomes (Box 1).…”
Section: Selecting Beneficial Symbionts: One Problem Many Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%