2012
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.034033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasphingopyxis lamellibrachiae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a marine annelid worm

Abstract: A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, motile, orange-pigmented, slightly halophilic, rod-shaped bacterium, designated strain JAMH 0132T, was isolated from the trophosome of a tubeworm in Kagoshima Bay, Japan, and its taxonomic position was investigated using a polyphasic approach. The novel strain grew optimally at 28–30 °C and with about 2.0 % (w/v) NaCl. Chemotaxonomic analysis showed that Q-10 was the predominant respiratory quinone and that C18 : 1ω7c, C16 : 0 2-OH and C16 : 0 were the major fatty acids. Sphingo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This family comprises of four well-known PAH-degrading genera, namely; Sphingomonas (Busse et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2012Chen et al, , 2013Takeuchi et al, 2001;Yabuuchi et al, 2002Yabuuchi et al, , 1999, Sphingobium (Busse et al, 2003;Takeuchi et al, 2001), Novosphingobium (Busse et al, 2003;Takeuchi et al, 2001), Sphingopyxis (Busse et al, 2003;Takeuchi et al, 2001;Yoon et al, 2008, which make up the sphingomonads (Kosako et al, 2000). Currently, ten other genera have been established in this family, including Sphingosinicella Maruyama et al, 2006;Yasir et al, 2010), Sandarakinorhabdus (Gich and Overmann, 2006), Stakelama (Chen et al, 2010;Thawng et al, 2013), Sphingorhabdus , Zymomonas (Glaeser and K€ ampfer, 2014), Sandaracinobacter (Yurkov et al, 1997), Sphingomicrobium (K€ ampfer et al, 2012), Blastomonas (Hiraishi et al, 2000), Pacificamonas (Liu et al, 2014) and Parasphingopyxis (Uchida et al, 2012). This classification of the Sphingomonadaceae family is based on the sequence phylogeny of the 16S rDNA gene and the presence of 2'-hydroxymyristoyl dihydrosphingosine 1-glucuronic acid (SGL-1) as the major sphingoglycolipid in the cells (Busse et al, 1999;Kosako et al, 2000).…”
Section: Taxonomic Properties Of Sphingomonadsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This family comprises of four well-known PAH-degrading genera, namely; Sphingomonas (Busse et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2012Chen et al, , 2013Takeuchi et al, 2001;Yabuuchi et al, 2002Yabuuchi et al, , 1999, Sphingobium (Busse et al, 2003;Takeuchi et al, 2001), Novosphingobium (Busse et al, 2003;Takeuchi et al, 2001), Sphingopyxis (Busse et al, 2003;Takeuchi et al, 2001;Yoon et al, 2008, which make up the sphingomonads (Kosako et al, 2000). Currently, ten other genera have been established in this family, including Sphingosinicella Maruyama et al, 2006;Yasir et al, 2010), Sandarakinorhabdus (Gich and Overmann, 2006), Stakelama (Chen et al, 2010;Thawng et al, 2013), Sphingorhabdus , Zymomonas (Glaeser and K€ ampfer, 2014), Sandaracinobacter (Yurkov et al, 1997), Sphingomicrobium (K€ ampfer et al, 2012), Blastomonas (Hiraishi et al, 2000), Pacificamonas (Liu et al, 2014) and Parasphingopyxis (Uchida et al, 2012). This classification of the Sphingomonadaceae family is based on the sequence phylogeny of the 16S rDNA gene and the presence of 2'-hydroxymyristoyl dihydrosphingosine 1-glucuronic acid (SGL-1) as the major sphingoglycolipid in the cells (Busse et al, 1999;Kosako et al, 2000).…”
Section: Taxonomic Properties Of Sphingomonadsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sphingomonads represent a group of Alphaproteobacteria, which encompass in our days the genera Novosphingobium, Sphingobium, Sphingomonas, Sphingopyxis, Sphingosinicella, Sphingomicrobium, Sphingorhabdus and Parasphingopyxis. These genera share a number of phenotypic traits, such as the presence of sphingolipids in their outer membranes, the formation of usually yellowpigmented colonies and a specific pattern of polyamines (K€ ampfer et al, 2012;Uchida et al, 2012;Jogler et al, 2013). Sphingomonads have been intensively studied during the last years because of their pronounced ability to degrade recalcitrant natural and xenobiotic compounds, such as various polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nonylphenols, sulphonated naphthalenes, chlorinated dibenzofurans and dibenzodioxins, carbazole, polyethylene glycols and different herbicides and pesticides (Stolz, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T was obtained by direct sequencing of PCRamplified DNA as described previously (Uchida et al, 2012). The resulting 16S rRNA gene sequence (1404 nt) of strain JAMH 043…”
Section: Reduction Of Nitritementioning
confidence: 99%