Parasocial relationships with audiences’ favorite celebrities: The role of audience and celebrity characteristics in a representative Flemish sample

Abstract

This article provides insight into one form of audience involvement with celebrities: parasocial relationships (PSR). To address several shortcomings in PSR research -focus on TV, confusion between PSI (parasocial interaction) and PSR, use of student samples, neglect of socio-demographic variables -a representative online survey was conducted with 1000 Flemish adults who indicated 382 celebrities as favorites. A new scale reveals that PSR contain two important elements: emotional connections and an analogy with social relationships. Confirming previous research, most favorite celebrities are male, and cultural proximity is especially important for older respondents. In one combined model, respondents' and celebrities' (socio-demographic) characteristics are included as potential PSR predictors. This model nuances previous research and reveals that people who are male, older, more lowly-educated, and interested in celebrity news have stronger PSR. Further, stronger PSR are found for local and religious, political, sports, and music celebrities than for film celebrities.

Social CEOs: The effects of CEOs’ communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites

“…Assertiveness is also positively related to communicative competence (Zakahi, 1985), which in turn affect relationship satisfaction and commitment (Arroyo and Segrin, 2011). To further gauge the enduring effects of PSI, scholars have theorized viewers' longterm parasocial relationship (PSR) with media persona constructed through various mediated encounters (Claessens and Van den Bulck, 2015). The effects of PSI for audience enjoyment, learning, identification, and need gratification in media consumption have also been widely documented (Tsay and Bodine, 2012).…”

Political Para-Social Relationship as a Predictor of Voting Preferences in the Israeli 2019 Elections

“…We base our expectation on a number of preliminary findings. First, simply put, people attribute very high PSR to politicians (Claessens & van den Bulck, 2015). Second, politicians use the same intimacy-inducing techniques, that are part of PSR, as entertainers (Marmor-Lavie & Weimann, 2008).…”

‘There’s a Starman waiting in the sky’: Mourning David #Bowie on Twitter

“…This allows them to build parasocial (i.e. one-sided and ‘virtual’, yet deeply felt) relationships with their favourite stars (Claessens and Van den Bulck, 2015; Marshall, 2006). Together, this so-called celebrity apparatus ensures the (ongoing) process of celebritization (Turner, 2004).…”