1995
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000075879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasitic disease in amphibians: control by the regulation of worm burdens

Abstract: This review considers three case studies based on macroparasites of anurans: (a) natural infections in the permanently-aquatic Xenopus laevis which represent the worm burdens acquired, and the implications for pathology, when hosts are exposed to continuous, year-round, transmission; (b) the desert toad, Scaphiopus couchii, which experiences invasion very briefly each year and provides a simplified system involving only a single significant infection (Pseudodiplorchis americanus); (c) the mesic Bufo bufo which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, parasites are more fecund in immunodeficient animals (Viney 2002b). These generalizations are supported by observations in amphibians, whereby regulation of worm abundance occurs after infection due either to density-dependent effects or immune responses of the host (Tinsley 1995). In our study, the total number of worms recovered in frog tissues at the end of the experiment corresponded to 75% of the initial dose and was similar among treatment groups, showing that the skin of naïve leopard frogs is very susceptible to R. ranae larvae as observed in other anurans (Goater and Ward 1992) and that pesticide exposure did not influence host recognition and penetration components of the transmission process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For example, parasites are more fecund in immunodeficient animals (Viney 2002b). These generalizations are supported by observations in amphibians, whereby regulation of worm abundance occurs after infection due either to density-dependent effects or immune responses of the host (Tinsley 1995). In our study, the total number of worms recovered in frog tissues at the end of the experiment corresponded to 75% of the initial dose and was similar among treatment groups, showing that the skin of naïve leopard frogs is very susceptible to R. ranae larvae as observed in other anurans (Goater and Ward 1992) and that pesticide exposure did not influence host recognition and penetration components of the transmission process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, this lack of pathology could be due to the early stage of infection, and inflammation could intensify with continued damage to the lung via hematophagous feeding by the parasite and irritation to the lung as gravid females release eggs/larvae into the lumen. In Rhabdias bufonis infecting B. marinus, the primary damage inflicted by the parasite comes from worms penetrating the skin and migrating, rather than effects of adults in the lungs (Tinsley, 1995). Larval migratory pathways and inflammatory responses to parasite exposure differed among the frog species, and between frogs and toads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum ingestion rates by adult P. americanus are 1.9-5.3 µl of blood/parasite/week at 25°C. Such precise measurements are rare for blood-feeding platyhelminths and enable calculation of pathogenic effects on the host under different environmental conditions Tinsley, 1992, 1994;Tinsley, 1993Tinsley, , 1995.…”
Section: Reproductive Biology Of Pseudodiplorchis Americanusmentioning
confidence: 99%