2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasites under pressure: salmon lice have the capacity to adapt to depth-based preventions in aquaculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, farmers may also intervene with barriers to infestation, including technologies to prevent encounters between lice and hosts in the surface layers where lice are most common, such as snorkel cages (Geitung et al 2019) and skirts (Grøntvedt et al 2018, Stien et al 2018, and behavioural manipulation of swimming depth using deep lights and feeding (Frenzl et al 2014). Swimming depth of the infectious copepodid larval stage varies among families (Coates et al 2020) and may have a genetic basis. If the vertical distribution of lice is influenced by heritable traits, then the increasing mean depth of available hosts could drive the evolution of lice larvae with deeper distributions.…”
Section: Host Availability and Host-finding Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, farmers may also intervene with barriers to infestation, including technologies to prevent encounters between lice and hosts in the surface layers where lice are most common, such as snorkel cages (Geitung et al 2019) and skirts (Grøntvedt et al 2018, Stien et al 2018, and behavioural manipulation of swimming depth using deep lights and feeding (Frenzl et al 2014). Swimming depth of the infectious copepodid larval stage varies among families (Coates et al 2020) and may have a genetic basis. If the vertical distribution of lice is influenced by heritable traits, then the increasing mean depth of available hosts could drive the evolution of lice larvae with deeper distributions.…”
Section: Host Availability and Host-finding Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A family's tendency to either ascend or descend could mean the difference between passing around a 10 m skirt or snorkel (bypassing the cage) or passing underneath it (and infesting the cage), even when other hydrodynamic factors are involved. The strong patterns across related groups, and the absence of observed environmental or maternal effects, suggests a genetically inherited element to the vertical distribution of copepodids (Coates et al 2020). Such genetic variation has been observed in other planktonic crustaceans: Daphnia are stratified in the water according to genotype (Dumont et al 1985;De Meester 1993;King & Miracle 1995).…”
Section: Selection For Deeper Copepodid Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong patterns across related groups, and the absence of observed environmental or maternal effects, suggests a genetically inherited element to the vertical distribution of copepodids (Coates et al . 2020). Such genetic variation has been observed in other planktonic crustaceans: Daphnia are stratified in the water according to genotype (Dumont et al .…”
Section: Depth‐based Preventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences were consistent when columns were pressurized to simulate the conditions found at a range of depths down to 10 m. Overall, higher pressures stimulated an increased frequency of upwards swimming, but the strength of this response varied strongly between families. There was no clear evidence of environmental or maternal effects accounting for this variation, pointing to at least some heritable component to vertical swimming behaviour in copepodids, although more research is needed to quantify this (Coates et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a genetic element to this behavioural variation, if depth‐based preventions select for louse copepodids that occur deeper in the water column (those that pass underneath barriers), adaptive responses are likely to ensue. To assess this possibility, it is first essential to determine whether the inter‐family variation observed in experimental columns (Coates et al, 2020 ) translates to differences in depth in the natural environment. Differences in the distribution of families might be diluted by the much larger scale of the natural water column or by environmental factors such as currents and salinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%