Animal Behavior and Parasitism 2022
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192895561.003.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasite-mediated sexual selection: To mate or not to mate?

Abstract: The concept of sexual selection has been around since Darwin, but the notion of parasites being a major driver of sexual selection in their hosts is relatively recent. Sparked by the inception of the Hamilton–Zuk hypothesis four decades ago, parasite-mediated sexual selection (PMSS) has since been a major focus of both theoretical and empirical research in evolutionary biology. This chapter discusses the development and current state of PMSS research, from the main hypotheses (good genes, transmission avoidanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, this method is more suitable than others for modelling systems where one species evolves much faster than the other, but is not suitable for modelling systems in which the species evolve on similar timescales (e.g., in microbial communities, such as bacteria-phage coevolution). Still, our method offers a relatively straightforward test for determining whether results which assume comparable (or arbitrary) rates of evolutionary change still apply when one species evolves much faster than the other, and so will be especially beneficial in scenarios restricted to plants/animals coevolving with microorganisms (e.g., parasite-mediated sexual selection/conflict (Ashby, 2020; Ashby and Boots, 2015; Hamilton and Zuk, 1982; Pirrie et al, 2022; Wardlaw and Agrawal, 2019)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, this method is more suitable than others for modelling systems where one species evolves much faster than the other, but is not suitable for modelling systems in which the species evolve on similar timescales (e.g., in microbial communities, such as bacteria-phage coevolution). Still, our method offers a relatively straightforward test for determining whether results which assume comparable (or arbitrary) rates of evolutionary change still apply when one species evolves much faster than the other, and so will be especially beneficial in scenarios restricted to plants/animals coevolving with microorganisms (e.g., parasite-mediated sexual selection/conflict (Ashby, 2020; Ashby and Boots, 2015; Hamilton and Zuk, 1982; Pirrie et al, 2022; Wardlaw and Agrawal, 2019)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, important feedbacks remain between the ecological and evolutionary dynamics that play a fundamental role in shaping coevolution (Ashby et al, 2019). Separating evolutionary and ecological timescales is also a reasonable approximation for many real biological systems, as evolutionary dynamics are often, but not always (Pelletier et al, 2009), much slower than ecological dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While theoretical studies of detection avoidance evolution are rare, there are strong analogies with sexually transmitted infections (STIs), such as chlamydia and gonorrhoea, which may have evolved to be inconspicuous to avoid detection by choosy mates (Ashby et al 2019, Pirrie, Chapman, andAshby 2022). If prospective mates are less likely to choose partners who display signs of infection, then this can create strong selection for being inconspicuous, similar to selection for diagnostic testing avoidance.…”
Section: Berngruber Et Al 2013)mentioning
confidence: 99%