2019
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasite‐mediated selection in a natural metapopulation of Daphnia magna

Abstract: Parasite‐mediated selection varying across time and space in metapopulations is expected to result in host local adaptation and the maintenance of genetic diversity in disease‐related traits. However, nonadaptive processes like migration and extinction‐(re)colonization dynamics might interfere with adaptive evolution. Understanding how adaptive and nonadaptive processes interact to shape genetic variability in life‐history and disease‐related traits can provide important insights into their evolution in subdiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several of these factors likely contributed to the Ne dynamics of H. tvaerminnensis, it is unclear which of them predominated. For example, D. magna varies strongly in susceptibility to H. tvaerminnensis, with the most susceptible hosts occurring in unstable habitats that have a high propensity to dry up in summer (like ephemeral rock or desert pools) (Cabalzar et al, 2019;Lange et al, 2015). These unstable habitats are also associated with frequent population extinctions and recolonizations as well as a loss of diversity because of frequent population bottlenecks.…”
Section: Historical Changes In Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several of these factors likely contributed to the Ne dynamics of H. tvaerminnensis, it is unclear which of them predominated. For example, D. magna varies strongly in susceptibility to H. tvaerminnensis, with the most susceptible hosts occurring in unstable habitats that have a high propensity to dry up in summer (like ephemeral rock or desert pools) (Cabalzar et al, 2019;Lange et al, 2015). These unstable habitats are also associated with frequent population extinctions and recolonizations as well as a loss of diversity because of frequent population bottlenecks.…”
Section: Historical Changes In Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to dominance and epistasis in the genetic architecture of resistance, this reshuffling resets the clock to the time before selection acted, rendering the response to selection zero. Although this is an extreme case of genetic slippage in response to sex, it is a powerful agent to maintain genetic diversity, which is a hallmark of resistance in natural populations of Daphnia and other animals, plants and bacteria (Altermatt and Ebert 2008;Desai and Currie 2015;Zhao et al 2016;Cabalzar et al 2019;Broniewski et al 2020;Sallinen et al 2020;White et al 2020). As climatic seasonality seems to determine the dynamics of parasite resistance in our host population, and given the known impact of climate change on epidemics in the D. magna-P. ramosa system (Auld and Brand 2017), one may speculate that the dynamics in our study population may change in response to the predicted changes in climatic conditions and seasonality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with the consistency of our observed pattern, these facts suggest that genetic drift plays only a very minor role in shaping the yearly resistotype dynamics in the Aegelsee D. magna population and that the observed changes are the result of adaptive evolution, which is not always the case in the Daphnia system. In a rock pool metapopulation of D. magna, for example, with populations of small effective and census sizes, gene flow and strong founder effects create more sensitivity to drift, with a relatively weak signal of adaptive evolution (Cabalzar et al 2019).…”
Section: Repeated Strong Parasite-mediated Selection In a Natural Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We added µL of 10-% Chelex solution and µL of proteinase K and incubated samples for two hours at 55 °C followed by 10 min at 99 °C. Fragment amplification, genotyping and allele scoring was done following the protocol described in Cabalzar et al (2019) (see Supplementary Markers Table S22 for PCR reaction details).…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Pcr-based Markers Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%