1999
DOI: 10.2307/2640828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasite-Mediated Selection against Inbred Soay Sheep in a Free-Living, Island Population

Abstract: Parasites are thought to provide a selective force capable of promoting genetic variation in natural populations. One rarely considered pathway for this action is via parasite-mediated selection against inbreeding. If parasites impose a fitness cost on their host and the offspring of close relatives have greater susceptibility to parasites due to the increased homozygosity that results from inbreeding, then parasite-mediated mortality may select against inbred individuals. This hypothesis has not yet been test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
725
6
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 559 publications
(752 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
17
725
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 181 wild dogs assigned f values, 85 (from eight packs) also were genotyped to include corresponding molecular metrics. Standardized multilocus heterozygosity (stMLH) was calculated based on the proportion of loci genotyped for a given individual that was heterozygous divided by mean heterozygosity in the population at the same loci (Coltman et al 1999;Slate et al 2004). IR reflects the relatedness of the parents of an individual by determining the degree of allele-sharing relative to random expectations across all loci (Amos et al 2001).…”
Section: Molecular Metrics Of Heterozygositymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 181 wild dogs assigned f values, 85 (from eight packs) also were genotyped to include corresponding molecular metrics. Standardized multilocus heterozygosity (stMLH) was calculated based on the proportion of loci genotyped for a given individual that was heterozygous divided by mean heterozygosity in the population at the same loci (Coltman et al 1999;Slate et al 2004). IR reflects the relatedness of the parents of an individual by determining the degree of allele-sharing relative to random expectations across all loci (Amos et al 2001).…”
Section: Molecular Metrics Of Heterozygositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular metric assessments have led to HFC discoveries involving fitness traits such as fecundity (Amos et al 2001), immunocompetence (Coltman et al 1999), recruitment (Jensen et al 2007) and survival (DaSilva et al 2006). Although small populations of endangered species are most vulnerable to inbreeding and fitness reduction (Fitzpatrick and Evans 2009), most HFC studies have focused on large populations of common species (see Grueber et al 2008 for review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inbred individuals might be less resistant to disease if they are unable to recognize as wide a breadth of pathogens and parasites as relatively outbred individuals, or if disease-causing agents are part of an environment that selects against individuals expressing deleterious recessive alleles (Coltman et al 1999). Empirical evidence for disease costs of inbreeding has been documented in captive settings (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence for disease costs of inbreeding has been documented in captive settings (e.g. Spielman et al 2004;Hawley et al 2005;Ross-Gillespie et al 2007;Charpentier et al 2008;Ilmonen et al 2008) as well as in an array of free-living taxa, including California sea lions (Zalophus californianus; Acevedo- Whitehouse et al 2003), Mediterranean striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba; Valsecchi et al 2004), Galapagos hawks (Buteo galapagoensis; Whiteman et al 2006), Soay sheep (Ovis aries; Coltman et al 1999), harbour seals (Phoca vitulina; Rijks et al 2008) and American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos; Townsend et al 2009a). In some studies, however, the relationship between inbreeding and disease is unclear (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%