2020
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasite intensity and the evolution of migratory behavior

Abstract: Migration can allow individuals to escape parasite infection, which can lead to a lower infection probability (prevalence) in a population and/or fewer parasites per individual (intensity). Because individuals with more parasites often have lower survival and/or fecundity, infection intensity shapes the life‐history trade‐offs determining when migration is favored as a strategy to escape infection. Yet, most theory relies on susceptible‐infected (SI) modeling frameworks, defining individuals as either healthy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…n = 300 , in the absence of parasites, t * l = 0.5 (minimum possible emergence period length), all other parameters are the same as in Table 1. results presented herein that host-parasite intensity is predicted to select for partial host migration (Balstad et al, 2021; Binning, 2016)-a prediction that is matched by empirical data on reindeer (Folstad et al, 1991) and fish migration (Poulin et al, 2012;Sikkel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…n = 300 , in the absence of parasites, t * l = 0.5 (minimum possible emergence period length), all other parameters are the same as in Table 1. results presented herein that host-parasite intensity is predicted to select for partial host migration (Balstad et al, 2021; Binning, 2016)-a prediction that is matched by empirical data on reindeer (Folstad et al, 1991) and fish migration (Poulin et al, 2012;Sikkel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Third, the host population can go extinct, if both costs (infection, residency) are too high (figure 2, grey regions). Intriguingly, we never see an outcome of partial migration (0 < θ < 1), where only a subset of the population migrates each year (an outcome we have seen in many of our earlier models [6164]).
Figure 2Migration strategies.
…”
Section: Migratory Loss In Response To An Emerging Infectionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For example, we never observed partial migration, but our past work suggests that a reduction in migration (i.e. shift from full migration to partial migration) should be a possible outcome when parasites have density-dependent transmission [62], when migration decisions depend on infection [63,64], and when recovery from infection is possible [61]. Our work is in line with the broader idea that parasites are critical, if overlooked, drivers of host behaviour and life history and that, 50 years on, EGT remains a topical and relevant way of studying patterns of animal behaviour, including migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cardiovascular, or respiratory function; Warnecke et al, 2013). More broadly, disease ecology models rarely consider intensity-dependent sublethal effects of the host fitness (Balstad et al, 2021;Joseph et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%