1996
DOI: 10.3354/meps134235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paraphysomonas imperforata (Protista, Chrysomonadida) under different turbulence levels:feeding, physiology and energetics

Abstract: lngestion rates of Paraphysornonas imperforata Lucas feedlng on bacteria were studied under a range of turbulence ~ntensities. Turbulence had no effect on per cell ingestion rates of flagellates either upon initial exposure to turbulent conditions or after 12 h under the turbulence treatment. Flagellates increased in numbers and decreased in size at all turbulence intensities as well as in nonturbulence treatments, probably as an adaptation to an environment with lower food concentration than the stock culture… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where T is the portion of the period following the passage of the grid that showed a trend of decreasing turbulent kinetic energy (Peters et al 1996). At each stroke frequency, 2 values of <E> were computed: 1 for the downward passage of the grid and 1 for the upward passage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where T is the portion of the period following the passage of the grid that showed a trend of decreasing turbulent kinetic energy (Peters et al 1996). At each stroke frequency, 2 values of <E> were computed: 1 for the downward passage of the grid and 1 for the upward passage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abundance, size, mobility, biochemical composition, physiological state, surface characteristics, grazing resistance properties) and variables independent of prey. Among the latter, temperature (Sherr et al 1988, Tobiesen 1990, light intensity (Stoecker & Guillard 1982, Hansen & Nielsen 1997, Strom 2001, ultraviolet radiation (Hessen et al 1997, Ochs & Eddy 1998, nutrient concentrations (Ucko et al 1994, Legrand et al 1998, Granéli & Johansson 2003, turbulence (Shimeta et al 1995, Peters et al 1996, Dolan et al 2003, suspended non-grazable particles (Hansen et al 1991, Boenigk & Novarino 2004, and particularly bioactive compounds and toxic compounds (Hoffman & Atlas 1987, Al-Rasheid & Sleigh 1994 can regulate feeding activity in phagotrophic protists, but their role in selective feeding has rarely been specifically investigated. Most of these abiotic external variables can either directly affect the feeding behaviour of phagotrophic protists, or indirectly influence them through changes upon their prey.…”
Section: Linking Food Selection With the Natural Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, GGEs for many protists do seem to vary considerably -even within the same species and despite efforts to conduct balanced-growth experiments (e.g. Verity 1985, Strom & Busky 1993, Peters et al 1996. Thus, other factors, such as food concentration or quality, apparently influence GGE.…”
Section: Flagellate Ggementioning
confidence: 99%