Paranoia Checklist

Freeman, Daniel; Bebbington, Paul; Smith, Benjamin D.; Rollinson, Rebecca; Fowler, D.; Kuipers, Elizabeth; Ray, Katarzyna; Dunn, Graham

doi:10.1037/t24223-000

Cited by 9 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Paranoia was assessed with an adapted version of the 18-item self-report Paranoia Checklist (Freeman et al 2005). Jumpingto-conclusions was assessed using a computerized version of the beads task developed by Todd S. Woodward.…”

Section: Research Lettermentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Letter: From stress to paranoia: an experimental investigation of the moderating and mediating role of reasoning biases

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Research Lettermentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Letter: From stress to paranoia: an experimental investigation of the moderating and mediating role of reasoning biases

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, a well-known diagnostic instrument called Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI, (Smeets & Dingemans, 1993) has not been examined psychometrically in Indonesian context. Another potential scale that can be used for gathering evidence of convergent validity is Paranoia Checklist (Freeman et al, 2005) and LaunaySlade Hallucination Scale (Launay & Slade, 1981), but the psychometric evidence of the Indonesian version of both scales are not yet examined and, to my knowledge, they are not yet translated. Another important future research direction is to examine the clinical utility and validity of the Indonesian CAPE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…and negative symptoms (e.g., Do you ever feel that your emotions are blunted?) The CAPE is so far the only self-report questionnaire that measures psychotic experiences comprehensively, unlike other popular psychotic experiences self-report questionnaires that only measure a dimension of psychotic experiences such as paranoia (paranoia checklist, (Freeman et al, 2005)) and hallucination (Launay-Slade hallucination scale, (Launay & Slade, 1981)). Its popularity is also illustrated in a meta-analysis study examining the psychometric properties of the CAPE that involves 111 studies (Mark & Toulopoulou, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Indonesian Version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences

Jaya¹

2017

Makara Hubs-Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a popular self-report questionnaire that measures lifetime psychotic experiences. However, despite being popular, a consistent factorial structure across nations has not been found. Furthermore, the factorial structure of the Indonesian version has not been examined questioning the types of symptoms that can be measured. Cross-sectional community sample from Indonesia (N = 844) was used in this study. Confirmatory factor analyses results showed that the original three dimensions and nine dimensions factorial structure of the CAPE were found to have an acceptable fit to the data. However, the nine dimensions factorial structure has significantly better fit than the three dimensions. Therefore, the Indonesian version of the CAPE consists of positive symptoms (bizarre experiences, hallucinations, paranoia, magical thinking and grandiosity), negative symptoms (affective flattening, social withdrawal, and avolition) and depressive symptoms. Analisis Faktor Konfirmatoris Dari Assesmen Komunitas terhadap Pengalaman Psikotik versi Indonesia AbstrakAsesmen Komunitas terhadap Pengalaman Psikotik (AKPP) adalah kuesioner populer yang mengukur pengalaman psikotik seumur hidup. Namun, meskipun populer, struktur faktor yang konsisten antar negara-negara belum ditemukan. Selain itu, struktur faktor untuk kuesioner versi Indonesia belum diteliti. Tanpa mengetahui struktur faktor kuesioner AKPP dalam bahasa Indonesia, kita tidak dapat mengetahui jenis gejala psikotik apa saja yang dapat diukur dengan baik di Indonesia dengan kuesioner ini. Sampel komunitas cross-sectional dari Indonesia (N = 844) digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Analisis faktor konfirmatori menunjukkan bahwa tiga dimensi dan sembilan dimensi struktur faktor AKPP memiliki fit yang baik dengan data. Namun, sembilan dimensi struktur faktorial lebih cocok daripada tiga dimensi secara signifikan. Oleh karena itu, AKPP bisa dianggap mengukur gejala positif (pengalaman aneh, halusinasi, paranoia, pemikiran magis, dan waham kebesaran), gejala negatif (afek datar, penarikan sosial, dan amotivasi) dan gejala depresi.

show abstract

“…It is a common experience which, in its most severe form, is expressed as persecutory delusions in people with psychotic diagnoses such as schizophrenia (Moutoussis et al 2007), affective psychosis (Lattuada et al 1999) or related conditions, but which is found in less severe forms in healthy populations (Freeman et al 2005). This latter finding forms part of the evidence base suggesting that psychotic-like phenomena in general can be detected within the general population (Hanssen et al 2005;van Os et al 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Negative emotions (anxiety and depression) have also been shown to be associated with dimensions of paranoia in clinical and non-clinical populations (Freeman et al 2005(Freeman et al , 2008, and there is strong evidence from large clinical cohort studies that they are specifically implicated in the development and maintenance of persecutory delusions Fowler et al 2012). Such affective dysregulation has been suggested to be an aetiological pathway to psychosis (van Os & Kapur, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Negative cognition, affect, metacognition and dimensions of paranoia in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: a multi-level modelling analysis

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

n Morrison, A.P. et al. (2015) Negative cognition, affect, metacognition and dimensions of paranoia in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: a multi-level modelling analysis. Psychological Medicine, 45(12), pp. 2675-2684.There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/109839/ Background. Paranoia is one of the commonest symptoms of psychosis but has rarely been studied in a population at risk of developing psychosis. Based on existing theoretical models, including the proposed distinction between 'poor me' and 'bad me' paranoia, we aimed to test specific predictions about associations between negative cognition, metacognitive beliefs and negative emotions and paranoid ideation and the belief that persecution is deserved (deservedness).Method. We used data from 117 participants from the Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation for people at risk of psychosis (EDIE-2) trial of cognitive-behaviour therapy, comparing them with samples of psychiatric in-patients and healthy students from a previous study. Multi-level modelling was utilized to examine predictors of both paranoia and deservedness, with post-hoc planned comparisons conducted to test whether person-level predictor variables were associated differentially with paranoia or with deservedness.Results. Our sample of at-risk mental state participants was not as paranoid, but reported higher levels of 'bad-me' deservedness, compared with psychiatric in-patients. We found several predictors of paranoia and deservedness. Negative beliefs about self were related to deservedness but not paranoia, whereas negative beliefs about others were positively related to paranoia but negatively with deservedness. Both depression and negative metacognitive beliefs about paranoid thinking were specifically related to paranoia but not deservedness.Conclusions. This study provides evidence for the role of negative cognition, metacognition and negative affect in the development of paranoid beliefs, which has implications for psychological interventions and our understanding of psychosis.

show abstract

Paranoia Checklist

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Research Letter: From stress to paranoia: an experimental investigation of the moderating and mediating role of reasoning biases

Research Letter: From stress to paranoia: an experimental investigation of the moderating and mediating role of reasoning biases

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Indonesian Version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences

Negative cognition, affect, metacognition and dimensions of paranoia in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: a multi-level modelling analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About