2018
DOI: 10.1177/0391560318761289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paraneoplastic digital ischemia in clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma: Report of a case and review of the literature

Abstract: Digital ischemia has been rarely associated, as a paraneoplastic syndrome, with renal cancer. Since it can severely compromise the patients’ quality of life, early recognition is important, in order to optimally address it with currently available treatment options, such as tyrosine inhibitors. Digital ischemia may occur in the general population and it can be the result of other non-cancerous diseases; accordingly, a thorough and aggressive work-up is mandatory, together with appropriate therapeutic steps suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few cases of acute digital ischaemia have been described showing classical symptoms of Raynaud’s phenomenon. In these patients, tumor progression is more aggressive compared to the average patient cohort [ 10 ]. In another report, a fatal outcome of pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy based on a papillary RCC was identified, in which tumorous microemboli formed in the pulmonary arterioles and subsequently lead to right heart failure [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few cases of acute digital ischaemia have been described showing classical symptoms of Raynaud’s phenomenon. In these patients, tumor progression is more aggressive compared to the average patient cohort [ 10 ]. In another report, a fatal outcome of pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy based on a papillary RCC was identified, in which tumorous microemboli formed in the pulmonary arterioles and subsequently lead to right heart failure [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%