2014
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-2014-02870-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paramodular cusp forms

Abstract: We classify Siegel modular cusp forms of weight two for the paramodular group K(p) for primes p < 600. We find that weight two Hecke eigenforms beyond the Gritsenko lifts correspond to certain abelian varieties defined over Q of conductor p. The arithmetic classification is in the companion article by A. Brumer and K. Kramer [4]. The Paramodular Conjecture, supported by these computations and consistent with the Langlands philosophy and the work of H. Yoshida [31], is a partial extension to degree 2 of the Shi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [21] it was shown that for primes p < 600, if p ∈ {277, 349, 353, 389, 461, 523, 587} then the weight two paramodular cusp forms are spanned by Gritsenko lifts, that is, …”
Section: N=1 To Construct Holomorphic Borcherds Products Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21] it was shown that for primes p < 600, if p ∈ {277, 349, 353, 389, 461, 523, 587} then the weight two paramodular cusp forms are spanned by Gritsenko lifts, that is, …”
Section: N=1 To Construct Holomorphic Borcherds Products Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], there are examples of abelian surfaces of prime conductor. The first few Euler factors for each of them are shown to match those of a paramodular form in [27]. However, none of those surfaces has been proved to be modular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Antisymmetric paramodular cusp forms of weight 2 are also very interesting. For a prime polarisation, such a form might exist only for p = 587 (see [26]). At the moment, only three examples are known (see [19]) for t = 587, 713, 893.…”
Section: Lifting Scalar-valued Modular Forms To Jacobi Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%