1997
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-997-1570-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametrization of momentum and energy depositions from gravity waves generated by tropospheric hydrodynamic sources

Abstract: Abstract. The mechanism of generation of internal gravity waves (IGW) by mesoscale turbulence in the troposphere is considered. The equations that describe the generation of waves by hydrodynamic sources of momentum, heat and mass are derived. Calculations of amplitudes, wave energy fluxes, turbulent viscosities, and accelerations of the mean flow caused by IGWs generated in the troposphere are made. A comparison of different mechanisms of turbulence production in the atmosphere by IGWs shows that the nonlinea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristics, as well as coefficients of turbulent viscosity and heat conduction and dissipation of IGW harmonics at critical and reflection levels, are calculated here, as described by . The influence of the critical layers leads, in the model, to stronger dissipation of IGW harmonics propagating in the direction of the mean wind and to the predominance of waves propagating in the opposite direction (Gavrilov, 1997). Such IGW filtering provides, in the model, the wave accelerations of the mean flow directed mainly opposite to the direction of the strato-mesospheric winds in the middle atmosphere (Gavrilov, 1997), which is consistent with recent views (Fritts and Alexander, 2003).…”
Section: Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These characteristics, as well as coefficients of turbulent viscosity and heat conduction and dissipation of IGW harmonics at critical and reflection levels, are calculated here, as described by . The influence of the critical layers leads, in the model, to stronger dissipation of IGW harmonics propagating in the direction of the mean wind and to the predominance of waves propagating in the opposite direction (Gavrilov, 1997). Such IGW filtering provides, in the model, the wave accelerations of the mean flow directed mainly opposite to the direction of the strato-mesospheric winds in the middle atmosphere (Gavrilov, 1997), which is consistent with recent views (Fritts and Alexander, 2003).…”
Section: Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…where s is the strength of wave sources (see Gavrilov, 1997); N d is the rate of IGW dissipation. The main contributions to dissipation rate N d are from turbulent and molecular viscosity and heat conduction, radiative heat exchange, and ion drag (see Gavrilov, 1990).…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics, as well as coefficients of turbulent viscosity and heat conduction and dissipation of IGW harmonics at critical and reflection levels, are calculated here as described by Gavrilov and Fukao [1999]). Influence of the critical layers leads in the model to stronger dissipation of IGW harmonics propagating in the direction of the mean wind and to the predominance of waves propagating in opposite direction [see Gavrilov, 1997]. Such IGW filtering provides in the model the wave accelerations of the mean flow directed mainly opposite to the direction of the stratomesospheric winds in the upper middle atmosphere [Gavrilov, 1997], which is consistent with recent views [Fritts and Alexander, 2003].…”
Section: Numerical Model and Background Atmospheresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore an increase in B 1 is mainly equivalent to larger relative strengths of sources of eastward propagating IGW in the model. These IGWs are subject of larger filtering out by eastward background winds in winter stratomesosphere due to stronger dissipation and critical levels [see Gavrilov , 1997]. This leads to smaller the average IGW variances for B 1 = 0.3 in Figures 15 and 16 in winter compared to that for B 1 = 0.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical estimations and numerical modelling (Gavrilov, 1997) show that IGWs propagating in the direction of the mean wind have smaller vertical wavelengths and larger dissipation than analogous IGWs propagating opposite to the mean wind. The net IGW momentum¯ux is a vector sum of momentum¯uxes produced by individual IGW components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%