2003
DOI: 10.1021/ac034800e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Time Warping

Abstract: A parametric model is proposed for the warping function when aligning chromatograms. A very fast and stable algorithm results that consumes little memory and avoids the artifacts of dynamic time warping. The parameters of the warping function are useful for quality control. They also are easily interpolated, allowing alignment of batches of chromatograms based on warping functions for a limited number of calibration samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
371
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 562 publications
(417 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
371
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting oxonium ion profiles were then smoothed by LOESS 42 and adjusted for differences in retention time by parametric time warping. 43,44 The dissimilarities between each pair of samples were calculated as the sum of the absolute differences between resulting oxonium ion relative abundances from 0–80 minutes. For the site-specific calculations, the sample dissimilarities were calculated over time intervals of 0–20 minutes (glycopeptide site 1), 20–36 minutes (glycopeptide site 2/3), 36–55 minutes (glycopeptide site 4), and 55–80 minutes (glycopeptide site 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting oxonium ion profiles were then smoothed by LOESS 42 and adjusted for differences in retention time by parametric time warping. 43,44 The dissimilarities between each pair of samples were calculated as the sum of the absolute differences between resulting oxonium ion relative abundances from 0–80 minutes. For the site-specific calculations, the sample dissimilarities were calculated over time intervals of 0–20 minutes (glycopeptide site 1), 20–36 minutes (glycopeptide site 2/3), 36–55 minutes (glycopeptide site 4), and 55–80 minutes (glycopeptide site 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once acquired, the hyperspectral images were unfolded and the spectra were baseline corrected using the Asymmetric Least Squares (AsLS) (Eilers, 2003) algorithm with a λ value of 10 5 and a p value of 10 -3 . After baseline correction, cosmic rays have been removed with the algorithm developed by Sabin et al (Sabin et al, 2012) with a k value of 15.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the three more popular algorithms that will be presented below, there are several others that have been developed (Yao et al, 2007;Toppo et al, 2008;Eilers, 2004;Van Nederkassel et al, 2006). In deciding which approach to use, one of the first questions to be answered is if the analysis is to be qualitative or quantitative.…”
Section: Raw Signal Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%