2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric study on state-of-the-art analytical models for fan broadband interaction noise predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Lewis et al [21] performed a very detailed comparison of different analytical models with the NASA SDT data base, namely Ventres' [26], Hanson's [27] , Posson's [28,29] and Masson's [10] models. As already mentioned in [2], a thorough validation of the model implementation was achieved.…”
Section: Broadband Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Lewis et al [21] performed a very detailed comparison of different analytical models with the NASA SDT data base, namely Ventres' [26], Hanson's [27] , Posson's [28,29] and Masson's [10] models. As already mentioned in [2], a thorough validation of the model implementation was achieved.…”
Section: Broadband Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, accounting for subcritical gusts improves the low-frequency predictions as was found previously by Moreau & Roger [37,38] for isolated airfoils, Roger for an annular airfoil [39] and Posson & Roger [40] for rectilinear cascades. Lewis et al [21] also compared the three-dimensional cascade response with Amiet's isolated airfoil response, and showed that both vane responses do not agree for high-solidity configurations, even at high frequency, contrarily to what was found before in 2D [41] and consistently with what Grace found by introducing 6 of 24 the spanwise wave number in her RSI code [42]. In summary, only full three-dimensional models give results that are consistent with experimental data, confirming that both a proper three-dimensional flow description and the use of three-dimensional cascade response are mandatory to carry out analytically based acoustic predictions.…”
Section: Broadband Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotor-stator interaction noise results from the interaction of turbulence in the rotor wakes with the leading edge of the stator, which generates an unsteady loading on the vanes. The rotor-stator interaction noise mechanism is often considered to be the dominant noise source of the fan stage at approach condition [7,8]. Over the past few decades, several techniques have been developed to model and predict both trailing edge and rotor-stator interaction noise [3,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical models are available for the prediction of fan broadband noise [8,9]. Initial analytical models considered either the turbulent flow impinging on the leading edge of an isolated airfoil or the diffraction of a turbulent boundary layer at the airfoil TE [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of highly detailed noise and flow measurements have also been made on engines but these are usually done at laboratory-scale where the flow conditions do not precisely match those in a full-scale engine [6,7]. A comprehensive study regarding the impact of different assumptions made in the analytical models on noise predictions can be found in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%