2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-017-9856-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Study of Alternating Flow Patterns in Non-Reacting Multiple-Swirl Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the multi-swirl LDI combustor depends on numerous design factors, such as the quantity and dimensions of injector elements, the type of air swirler (radial or axial), the design of the swirler (number of swirl vanes, swirler angle, and direction) and the type of fuel nozzle. Experiments and simulations were carried out to compare the effect of these variables on combustor performance in terms of flame stability, NOx, and CO emissions [26][27][28][29][30]. The effect of spacing between the swirlers on the flow field is studied by Kao et al [26] for a linear array of five nozzles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of the multi-swirl LDI combustor depends on numerous design factors, such as the quantity and dimensions of injector elements, the type of air swirler (radial or axial), the design of the swirler (number of swirl vanes, swirler angle, and direction) and the type of fuel nozzle. Experiments and simulations were carried out to compare the effect of these variables on combustor performance in terms of flame stability, NOx, and CO emissions [26][27][28][29][30]. The effect of spacing between the swirlers on the flow field is studied by Kao et al [26] for a linear array of five nozzles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported a large degree of unsteadiness due to highly turbulent flow close to the combustion chamber inlet. Dolan et al [28] involved non-reacting RANS simulations on a two-nozzle configuration. They noted the presence of alternating flow patterns in relation to the nozzle exit flare angles of 105 degrees (corresponding to a swirl number of 0.79) and 120 degrees (corresponding to swirl numbers of 0.69 and 0.79).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%