2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44988-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Stochastic Well-Formed Nets and Compositional Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the endeavor to build a complete and monolithic model to capture the whole system behaviors also confronts largeness problem (also known as state-space explosion) in modeling. To deal with this issue, one may adopt different modeling techniques and methodologies such as state truncation [61], state aggregation [62], model decomposition [63,64], state exploration [65,66], and model composition [67,68]. Other different methodologies have been also adopted popularly in literature, which are also appropriate to deal with scalability and largeness problems of modeling a large DCN system such as (i) hierarchical models, which partition a complex model into a hierarchy of submodels [69] or combine combinatorial models and state-space models [70][71][72], (ii) interactive models [22,73,74], which divide a large monolithic model into a number of smaller scale models with comprehensive interactions and dependencies, (iii) fixed-point iterative models [75], and (iv) discrete-event simulation [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the endeavor to build a complete and monolithic model to capture the whole system behaviors also confronts largeness problem (also known as state-space explosion) in modeling. To deal with this issue, one may adopt different modeling techniques and methodologies such as state truncation [61], state aggregation [62], model decomposition [63,64], state exploration [65,66], and model composition [67,68]. Other different methodologies have been also adopted popularly in literature, which are also appropriate to deal with scalability and largeness problems of modeling a large DCN system such as (i) hierarchical models, which partition a complex model into a hierarchy of submodels [69] or combine combinatorial models and state-space models [70][71][72], (ii) interactive models [22,73,74], which divide a large monolithic model into a number of smaller scale models with comprehensive interactions and dependencies, (iii) fixed-point iterative models [75], and (iv) discrete-event simulation [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replicate and join operators for SANs make several copies of a SAN, and connect SANs by merging places and transitions, respectively. Recently, a composition mechanism [11] has been defined for SWNs. While smaller and more understandable modules can be composed into one large model, even the developers admit that the composition tool is not easy to use, there are no methods for validating the composition, and the resulting composed models are hardly readable [47].…”
Section: Formal Methods and Industrial-sized Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to a largeness problem in analytical modeling of large networked systems. Nonetheless, one can use the techniques and algorithms proposed in [51] to reduce complexity in system modeling at RG models, or can apply typical solutions to avoid state-space explosion such as state truncation [102], state aggregation [103], model decomposition [104], state exploration [105], [106], and model composition [107], [108] in SRN modeling at components level. The attempt to predict different metrics of interest of a system by using analytical models is essentially to provide a reliable theoretical basis to facilitate system design processes, as well as to enhance system performance control processes in the long run.…”
Section: ) Practical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%