2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/globalsip.2013.6737075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Poisson process imaging

Abstract: In conventional 3D imaging, a large number of detected photons is required at each pixel to mitigate the effect of signal-dependent Poisson or shot noise. Parametric Poisson process imaging (PPPI) is a new framework that enables scene depth acquisition with very few detected photons despite significant contribution from background light. Our proposed computational imager is based on accurate physical modeling of the photon detection process using time-inhomogeneous Poisson processes combined with regularizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier efforts in SPAD-based 3D imaging from on the order of 1 detected ppp are reported in [12]- [14]. The framework presented here improves upon these works in part due to the use of estimated reflectivity.…”
Section: Photon-efficient Computational 3-d and Reflectivitymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier efforts in SPAD-based 3D imaging from on the order of 1 detected ppp are reported in [12]- [14]. The framework presented here improves upon these works in part due to the use of estimated reflectivity.…”
Section: Photon-efficient Computational 3-d and Reflectivitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The most photon-efficient TOF imagers-those requiring the fewest photons for accurate imaging-use single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) detectors [10]. Earlier efforts in SPAD-based 3D imaging from on the order of 1 detected ppp are reported in [11]- [13]. The framework presented here improves upon these works in part due to the use of estimated reflectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this imaging method, it needed to take twice detections of long and short exposure time to determine the best depth estimation of each pixel. Ahmed Kirmani and Dheera Venkatram et al [11][12][13] brought out a mathematical probability model of photon counting process equipped with the single-photon detector. They used the first detected photon to estimate the depth and reflectivity images of target combining the spatial correlation among adjacent pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most photonefficient imagers use single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) detectors [8]. See [9] for a discussion of compressive methods [10][11][12][13] and earlier efforts in SPAD-based 3D imaging [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its rasterscanning process to collect 1 ppp, however, makes the dwell time at each pixel a random variable. The dwell time is also a random variable when collecting any fixed number of photons per pixel, as in [15,16] for 3D imaging separated from reflectivity. Thus, FPI does not extend naturally to operation using SPAD arrays-since simultaneous measurement implies equal dwell times-and precludes the dramatic speedup in image acquisition that such arrays enable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%