Parametric Optimization and Decision Support Model Framework for Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Flexible Industrial Building Structures Integrating Production Planning
Abstract:Most industrial buildings have a very short lifespan due to frequently changing production processes. The load-bearing structure severely limits the flexibility of industrial buildings and is a major contributor to their costs, carbon footprint and waste. This paper presents a parametric optimization and decision support (POD) model framework that enables automated structural analysis and simultaneous calculation of life cycle cost (LCC), life cycle assessment (LCA), recycling potential and flexibility assessm… Show more
“…Life cycle costing is an economic quantitative estimation method (ISO/TC59, B.C. Reisinger et al, 2022). This method evaluates the entire cost of a building over its operating life (Zhang et al, 2018;Noshadravanet al, 2017).…”
Section: Life Cycle Cost Concept and Analysis Of The Construction Of ...mentioning
Recently, life cycle cost (LCC) has gained a wide acceptance in the field of industrial building construction, where it is categorized under economic sustainability in the overall sustainability of buildings. Hence, it is necessary to think about the categories and criteria that affect the building’s cost over its lifespan. In this study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making methodology, is employed to evaluate and weight four categories which are building blocks of the LCC of industrial building construction. The assessment model applies seventeen criteria which are distributed under the following four categories: initial cost, operating or maintenance cost, environmental impact cost, and the end of life. These are evaluated by thirty-seven civilian experts responding to a pair wise questionnaire. The results are significant as they reflect the viewpoints of the civilian experts and can aid in the development of a building's economic sustainability by illuminating the impact factors of the life cycle cost of buildings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to handle criteria evaluation of LCC for sustainable building using the AHP multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology.
“…Life cycle costing is an economic quantitative estimation method (ISO/TC59, B.C. Reisinger et al, 2022). This method evaluates the entire cost of a building over its operating life (Zhang et al, 2018;Noshadravanet al, 2017).…”
Section: Life Cycle Cost Concept and Analysis Of The Construction Of ...mentioning
Recently, life cycle cost (LCC) has gained a wide acceptance in the field of industrial building construction, where it is categorized under economic sustainability in the overall sustainability of buildings. Hence, it is necessary to think about the categories and criteria that affect the building’s cost over its lifespan. In this study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making methodology, is employed to evaluate and weight four categories which are building blocks of the LCC of industrial building construction. The assessment model applies seventeen criteria which are distributed under the following four categories: initial cost, operating or maintenance cost, environmental impact cost, and the end of life. These are evaluated by thirty-seven civilian experts responding to a pair wise questionnaire. The results are significant as they reflect the viewpoints of the civilian experts and can aid in the development of a building's economic sustainability by illuminating the impact factors of the life cycle cost of buildings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to handle criteria evaluation of LCC for sustainable building using the AHP multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology.
“…In the context of this project, flexibility is defined as "the ability of the building structure to resist and adapt to changes in use through changing manufacturing conditions" (Reisinger, 2021a). The presets as well as the conditions the genetic algorithm respects when generating building structures around a previous optimized production layout, are briefly clarified within the next chapter (Reisinger et al, 2020, Reisinger et al, 2021bReisinger et al, 2022a;Reisinger et al, 2022b). The POD tool was tested in 2020 through a pre-study.…”
Section: Pod Tool and Pmood Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while parametric design and automated planning methods are increasingly finding their way into building design processes and individual areas of the planning disciplines are researched to be optimized, a holistic approach for integrated structural building design optimization is missing (Reisinger et al, 2021a). In our previous study we developed a tool to achieve integration and improve structural performance for flexible industrial buildings (Reisinger, 2021c;Reisinger, 2022b). Within this conducted study, we have implemented a MOO in the parametric design process, and the MOO tool is tried.…”
Parametric multi-objective optimization tools bear potential to integrate, optimize, and explore design spaces to support interdisciplinary decision-making. A parametric optimization and decision support tool was developed (POD tool), and an evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithm implemented (PMOOD tool) to automate design search for flexible integrated industrial building design. Both tools were tested within a user study, simulating an interdisciplinary industrial building design process. The POD tool is rated slightly higher by evaluating the users' satisfaction with process, outcome, collaboration and technology through questionnaires for quantitative and qualitative feedback. The results indicate potential for improvement and future research regarding the PMOOD tool.
“…The current methods with the combination of LCC and LCA tend to lack certain integration and timeliness, and the results show some uncertainty in the input parameters [17]. Therefore, some scholars propose the basic idea of integration [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. However, in specific practice, the application of life cycle integration assessment research is narrow.…”
This paper proposes an integrated life cycle assessment-life cycle cost (LCA-LCC) model of environmental and economic factors for highway engineering technical schemes to problems such as the limitations of single-dimensional assessment, their narrow scope, the difficulty in tracing sources, and the conflicts of various dimensions in existing integrated assessment methods. The latest documents issued by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment and the Ministry of Transport of China used as an integrated assessment database. Air pollution, water pollution, solid waste pollution, noise pollution, energy consumption, pre-project cost, project construction cost, project operation cost, and post-project cost were used to construct the integrated assessment index system of environmental and economic factors. An improved entropy method was adopted in the LCA-LCC model to overcome the problems of ambiguous results of the previous entropy due to too few assessment schemes, the inoperability of the method when it encounters a negative value or zero value, and unbalanced multi-angle assessments. This model was applied to the assessment of two asphalt pavement maintenance schemes of Highway US280 in Alabama and two improvement schemes of high liquid limit soil subgrade of Highway G360 in Hainan. The results show that the LCA-LCC model overcomes the limitations and imbalances of a single LCA or LCC. The gravel improved scheme and the cold recycling scheme were identified through quantitative assessment as more sustainable. This paper can provide a reference for the comprehensive quantitative assessment of environmental and economic benefits of highway engineering technical schemes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.